Laserfiche WebLink
• <br /> • <br /> • <br /> MY 1,1984... • <br /> iI A special meeting of the Everett City Council called to order a< <br /> 7:00 p.m., May ga 1984, in[the 1 StevensHearing R <br /> Courthouse,President Stephenson presiding. ell Councilmen m were the <br /> attmance except 0 Lang.,who sd ..present. <br /> Planing Commission lm era Friel,Hummel,Marsh,Person,Maser <br /> and Shaffer. <br /> PUBLIC <br /> HEARING <br /> Stephenson commented the[the p is <br /> President <br /> is to nitre that the Planning commission an Cinrte public <br /> elmulan[eouelty shear all available, perspectives <br /> question. o the cit„a Council embers and andtheanswersning <br /> Commissioners. P said this will also reduce the number of public <br /> hearings a[which e duplicative testimony is given while allowing all <br /> interested parties access is all the decision makers. <br /> He i[is not the purpose o this joit ublic hearing toarrive <br /> at a simulan[eoush decision of City Council rthe' Planning <br /> ar The City Council's decision will only o be made after <br /> considering t Planning u C at public <br /> • <br /> hearing a regular Council meeting. eolloa•ing at public hearing <br /> tonight [he Council will <br /> selves e <br /> tF Planning <br /> commission could possiblycontinue a meeting eeting and make some <br /> decisions. Following their various meeting.they 111[hen brng a <br /> recomendation t o <br /> the Council a which time the Council will holm a <br /> n <br /> public hearing a make a decision. <br /> then turned'the meeting over [o the the.Planning commission <br /> lj He <br /> Fel. <br /> Chairman.Friel then stated that the staff would make a short <br /> presentation on the initial Planning Commission's recommendation <br /> o a[ and <br /> e <br /> new alternative policies. Following that, a staffwould <br /> and to questions from the Planning Commission and City C ncii. <br /> members <br /> testimony would then be given and any nen written commentsit <br /> emld bers ewouldeithen have nd. The ppo[unity Commissioners onask and City•gueatfons of tithe <br /> • public testifying. Following t the heading sasulne he closed..H <br /> i' then asked Hr.Doughty[o present that, <br /> staffs'report. <br /> Gary Doughty, of the Planning DepartMent, presentee a proposed <br /> resolution amendingthe <br /> Comp Plan by adopting eingle family <br /> residential policies. He then reviewed thepolicies as presented <br /> and recommended by the Planning Commission a alternatives rnatives as the <br /> ou <br /> staff shad interpreted the direction of the Council. <br /> He pointed out the first alternative changed the Planning <br /> Commssion's policies name for'Single Family Policies' t an <br /> Medium Density Residential Policies'. The Planning Commission <br /> policy a that'a limited number of duplexes should be allowed <br /> but under strict guidelines.. The alternative states <br /> duplexes, <br /> attached housing and limited a of multiple family housing <br /> should he allowed n appropriate amounts <br /> . <br />