Laserfiche WebLink
287 <br /> Silly 11,1984 <br /> f <br /> ]. That the use <br /> of the site by DNA and others shall be <br /> upon <br /> contingent u the EPA using disposal criteria which shall <br /> be developed approved by the City Planning Department <br /> .Priorany additional disposal activity o e <br /> subject <br /> property. dat te materil° plana shall with <br /> site ter the <br /> effective <br /> of t perp comply those <br /> 8. 1,at D. shall insure that a study of the site is <br /> conducted dil <br /> site. xt a minimum,the further <br /> the shall inactivity e <br /> include: <br /> (a) emical characterization of the site based on <br /> samples both within and outside of the 900 foot radius. <br /> (b) Biological characterisation of the sitesd <br /> adjacent deep water r areae including identification of 1 <br /> important resource populations. <br /> (al Chemical and biological characterization of the <br /> adjacent beach. <br /> n <br /> (d) Current patterns a and .the <br /> discussion of rhe fate of dredged material sandndits : <br /> possible transport off the site. <br /> • <br /> (e) M an=in of the potential for Cpland disposal <br /> o£hotM1 clean and contamineLed dredged na erlals.. <br /> 9(a) That only spoils materials from PortGardner-Bay, the <br /> Snohomish River,Possession E SaratogaP sage or Bort <br /> Susan be disposed of at the Everett site. {. <br /> an squired by t its.and <br /> Mr.Councilman <br /> Ervine replied asked <br /> DDR was¢the w lead agency and bad the <br /> heir <br /> an• environmental review and found that it was not necessary t0 have <br /> Mayo[SM a gueetloned Che advisability of a cep[ing dredging from <br /> outside the City's area. • <br /> • <br /> • eident Stephenson asked if therewas <br /> no other sitefor the <br /> dredgings,such s as the terminal, <br /> and Mr. Eee ren radthey were <br /> very limited t pree nt and Planning C mmieeion felt it m <br /> necessary to have aplace for dredge T <br /> material.. heir Permit <br /> 1984,. and they are recennendinga new <br /> L <br /> permit• sabe issued for�a five-year tern. <br /> M1at k <br /> Dave a s <br /> scarenae,of 516 Laurel,spoke of ten recent articles in the - <br /> raldon the pollution in he Sound and was againstreceiving <br /> ceiving <br /> material from other areae. He asked that an EIS be prepared. <br /> Wold, of 4611Rucker,Chairman of he Environmental c j. <br /> for the eelhead Chapter,presented a report o four year <br /> conducted• o relationships between pollutants and diseases ae <br /> n the Puget Sound by the National Marine Fisheries s e <br /> o presented a summary <br /> of atoxicity t tea Service. <br /> National Fisheries A ch Laboratory.ssThe eons the h les of <br /> !al years of effort Research <br /> scientists a technicians and represent <br /> thea state e of thart acne cox c Be also PointSound, <br /> ot <br /> that pesticides apparently run dost[thea riiver and go into ren a <br /> combining with oer pesticides ser area, the problems <br /> Problems and the scientists are not even away <br />