Laserfiche WebLink
289 <br /> • <br /> • July 11,1984 <br /> urley,of 4410 80th 5tSco <br /> ncerned that <br /> e Planning <br /> :mission and DNB focused o the cost esti nratherthan the <br /> health question of both the <br /> fish and the people eating the fish. He <br /> felt n should be i until their criteria and standards <br /> are revised as stated in condition 46. <br /> Mailys <br /> rep McNamara,as theywere concerned <br /> Olympic <br /> ned about the representing <br /> airte rbeing n <br /> te <br /> inthse <br /> close t owe ¢Howarth Park each. They also favored the three additional <br /> conditions <br /> Lorene of 1202 Cherry-Avenue, said she represented the <br /> cal Coalition, a they approved the <br /> cl2gnal esnditionev ve t it 1t wee rt a tall s Pint right <br /> direct ion. aha 2M1lught t soma o chs standards and criteria <br /> should be known before a permit 1s issued and recommended denying • <br /> the permit. <br /> anis Mar ah, <br /> nd the planning Commieeion, was happy a anywere the <br /> taking a this a anted o be involved in he <br /> study,e interest <br /> said n there a shift now from pevaluating the <br /> water s t ung the sediment and felt this as 1n the right <br /> directioncat a felt there needs to be public involvement in <br /> Condition 91,sh <br /> e ry e wP sed dispool aietrs [ pe0geinmaftaeii[alof ao <br /> their <br /> docks dna Pies. <br /> Steve Bre n o 5802 Sast 0[.ve,k of American Construction Comppani, <br /> felt that anyon efv o wanted to a large improvement such e <br /> TerminalNorton would h provide an prior <br /> was t <br /> receiving o a Avenueupermit f the 0 o dump,so he felt EIS <br /> no <br /> problem 1n allowing this permit to be issued. <br /> Donna <br /> eAuld there to a BIS <br /> rior to'them questioned <br /> muing thisdredge the Navy <br /> site again n and she old the oceaNavy <br /> • <br /> EIS <br /> is preparing an t present,which 111 be very detailed they <br /> will not be able to a anything until this 835 is approved. <br /> • <br /> ¢[per, of lTlicakes,objected to the dump site so close to <br /> • <br /> the swimming❑each of aowa[th Perk. <br /> Carl Rassebaum said their testing had been in the water quality but <br /> ere testing tha sedimentsto find 1 the a amination. <br /> no then o clean an contaminated,he said anything contamination. <br /> t 1810 <br /> in m the sedimentation would be clean. Since <br /> necessarilytbat e w <br /> bee a contamination,but St d. t mean it bad. • <br /> !loved by councilman L , seconded by Councilman Michelson, to <br /> close'the public hearing. <br /> • <br /> president tephanson asked if anyone further wished to speak and nen <br /> one replied. <br /> Roll was called with all Councilmen voting yea. <br /> Notion Carried <br />