Laserfiche WebLink
.- <br /> 461 <br /> December 5,1984 . <br /> The regular meeting of the Everett City Council wao called to order <br /> at 8:30 a.m.December 5,1984 in the Council Chambers of the Everett <br /> City Hall, President Stephenson,presiding. Upon roll call it was <br /> found that mayor moore and all councilmen were present. <br /> .. . • .. <br /> Minutes of the meeting held November 28, 1984 were approved as <br /> printedmith Councilmen Overstreet abstaining from voting. <br /> MAYOR'S COM9MNTS <br /> :ayora,Moaoreaask:dth: council to let him know ifa they wool: be <br /> pl:rtgi::a:'said 011ie It': l'ial and f=f'Ti;Im.get.st: Ill . <br /> ., . <br /> ri <br /> i <br /> ,..t.const% ig g g::eciUkT aa there haa'aa"'aaaa a'''aaa <br /> He then aske: th: cou=1 ctio,ydelete item 9 frm thehvagenda and <br /> ::::;T:adi Il s, A Attorney to ex lain w this was <br /> • - ,, . <br /> Mr.lales explmined the court action taken declaring the Renton adult <br /> use dinance as not being legal. The coUrt has maid limiting the <br /> a:ult use to a certain zoned area constituted a substantial I <br /> r striction on speech and that Renton failed to show a substantial <br /> governmental.'interest. A city must prove the zoning decision was <br /> ' motivated by a desire to further a compelling government interest <br /> unrelated to the suppression of free elseech. Me. ef kbc steted <br /> reasons for the ordinance were no more than expressions of dislike <br /> for the subject matter. <br /> The decisio%1:,,y the Court of Appeals Beverly hampers Everett's <br /> efforts to o eider the proposed adult uee zoning ordinance for <br /> ::op,ti:na. Whileathe city has factual evidence to support its zoning ,1 <br /> h a uses, factual,record in terms of that which the court <br /> suggests in the Renton case not been developed. For example, he •' <br /> said like Renton, Everett has relied on the experience of other <br /> .' communities, an approach which the court found to Me unacceptable, <br /> if relied on totally. <br /> • ,, <br /> He said because of the court case they had prepared a substitute <br /> ordinance to be read as item No. 9 on today's agenda,which mould •'I <br /> put the C-2 rose back to what it was before the adult use ordinance <br /> • had been prepared. He asked for concurrence by the council and that ' <br /> the public hearing be deleted. • <br /> Councilman PO,. asked Mr. Iles to look into the business license <br /> ordinance and see if displays of certain paraphernalia could be <br /> =red and also limit the type of home occupation licenses <br /> CoUncilman Morrow then read the following and asked that it be <br /> included verbatim in the council minutes: <br /> • <br /> 'I want to thank the mayor for withdrawing this poorly conceived 1 <br /> x-rated Honing ordinance from further diseuesion. I want the record . <br /> to Me cleer that x voted against the interim ordinance on MeY S eed , <br /> • <br /> • <br /> at that time.spoke vehemently against it. , <br /> • <br /> • <br /> • <br /> • <br /> . _' <br />