Laserfiche WebLink
484 <br /> December 19,1984 <br /> ir1"'+ lair Burroughs of Mills and Cogden, bonding attorneys, explained <br /> uthe n be <br /> sedpt cess s a LID <br /> properties, but this are erne ancmeteodthe city afelt <br /> the a benefit method thand said e fairest to instance <br /> property <br /> wn under this type of benefit[the app oks over <br /> the area s special determinesa the fair m value of h piece <br />.�` ropertye iso int does n what <br /> a formal appraisal.CO e explained <br /> nee <br /> the process of an saying if b the council approved the <br /> tonight,r/w ill be Dacq d, ill be called construction <br /> will begin, After the job r ompleted, another hearing w <br /> ill i1 will <br /> on the <br /> final assessment at wh rch time objections,of any, <br /> 1 ben rd the final assessments. <br /> SI <br /> . CelStrong of t EngineeringDepartment s this L was r the <br /> installation of sanitary s improvements a in the vicinity for <br /> 7th <br /> Ave. S.E. including he wacquietvan of propertyrights-of-way <br /> necessary[ t the a brie improvements. t assessed <br /> k valuation of carry <br /> land is $2,606,560, and 258 f n improvement <br /> C value is$853,6 22. 'There are n outstanding a The <br /> otal <br /> A[� estimatedcost <br /> st of the LID r is $1,620,300 and 1 assessed t e <br /> property . <br /> 030 he cost <br /> C contributions to thej y io fluit some,cdetermined <br /> of the oat o rape the 7th Ave. <br /> ed <br /> that [with <br /> them LID hosed b a n .7th <br /> 4 �`t' nation with [he LID for c n M1 es example,'roller <br /> f u 0 a vertical <br /> c condition 1 1 of <br /> hit of tee[•.wer, Would be n op Tortune time to also s torn up for the poo[ <br /> caning ° e <br /> e.f the a sewer coaster and <br /> shou he design erectedproblem with <br /> sen r <br /> some <br /> is 0. a awe mo em dna nn ould not Q0 corrected wt gas tax n rob sews <br /> f D funds. If the, 00f al allocation u f e/2 Tec will become part <br /> be used <br /> for <br /> the proojectte <br /> u�+ the will vertical <br /> aCeylI ore contribution to the LID <br /> ,fIi" from city 1/2 int s x fundis E the vertical curves are <br /> errant a the property <br /> eexceeds he cos in st <br /> eoft would pro osa rpnee any portione <br /> ��- of he c eedserG Che proposal w before he <br /> city council. <br /> at <br /> cirh{V. <br /> ' o date dthere h pres <br /> cribes that ga 6.36 of 609 protest would <br /> h � vest the amount. <br /> of Tautho�Gy oto proceed with the LID. City Council <br /> may determinethat the project, or an portion of the Prone., <br /> Is' <br /> 6 should be eliminated without a 606 protest. <br /> Igrha, A meeting was held v Septemberr <br /> w all property owners were <br /> a b <br /> invited o query propoal before large f public funds <br /> were expended. <br /> peedThe s defthe t d t meetas to ing <br /> take doe allow <br /> additional <br /> odothe preliinary <br /> questions from property ere prior estimate.he formation <br /> hearing, an additional meeting was set for Dec. 17, 1984, for the <br /> ss <br /> Property owners. <br /> input f he props the staff ending <br /> eased oamendment hemotrrdinan e. Every owners, <br /> r. is •he <br /> alreeady served by a se ptoses the pros el. that ths <br /> he <br /> £one large lot eth t is en y sewer <br /> further subdivided,w t ken 9 n': the project. If 9th <br /> Dr.is[ t ed from the project, eo <br /> entire language a 9.should <br />