My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1984/12/19 Council Minutes
>
Council Minutes
>
1984/12/19 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2020 11:15:58 AM
Creation date
9/28/2020 11:33:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Minutes
Date
12/19/1984
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
t <br /> 406 <br /> �' December 19,1984 <br /> . <br /> A protest w d from R Cel 439, marked <br /> Exhibit 20.a Stephensonaskedifs anyone wished <br /> this and Roberta esE a ce a because r. alloy <br /> Celia looked e at ze the <br /> lana to heteertne it could street <br /> developed. of the <br /> A protest not bx received from Pamine Klleve3! Parcel 41, marked <br /> Exhibit 21.was sxllever said t [eek runs h t property <br /> andthe back m[ <br /> coe [s all swamp. She said she afford to pay <br /> the assessment butshe doesn't want to develop selltheproperty <br /> Ft' <br /> either. <br /> 2 <br /> y.. Donald Watts filed a protest o cel 50 marked Exhibit 22. He <br /> said be had a septic tank that was-sufficient and saw no need for <br /> A protest w received from Harold M. Blake on cel 465, marked <br /> exhibit 23.asDr Blake complained he had received v notice <br /> on the bearing o Monday nd the amount of ase said <br /> Ci' t wase t premise that this propnwould be zoned <br /> F assessment <br /> rbut std present1e[i residential and he h e <br />'41 that could be zoned commercial. <br /> r Bt we"u said the app[avand d d p hat he <br /> Y ought d be th highest b f ti p y <br /> i, •,1,,,, David Stevens s d property of thesize his both.idea <br /> c 1 of his property were assessed 91f000 and his assessment e 837„0 <br /> Ht.: <br /> d he thought this was net a 1r a e as told <br /> this wasthat.his property was undeveloped and the other <br /> twos were for <br /> so the owners had already lP t in sewers on their <br /> 1 <br /> -1' <br /> 3 property. His protest was marked Exhibit 24' K was read <br /> A letter in favor o e proposed L. .from Maym V. ick x <br /> ae and marked Exhibit 25. . <br /> i0 ack Fish of 825 103rd asked what would happen to the road after <br /> thesew 559 installed and he w the con would have to <br /> replaces i <br /> t in the condition it wasp or the construction.. <br /> Hugh Pace of 3324 104th Place spoke in favor the LID. <br /> Don there is confusion as to how these <br /> made and e <br /> a he thought there should be more informations and discussion <br /> on this. <br /> Blair a ughs explained how[he a and termini method.was used <br /> d howut apeoval benefit 1s a and more accurate way <br /> of determining the benefits to the propertyte[ <br /> t' , Ccupcilmee PoDeasked,.and Mrs. Stronaid In acres, any pa t ereceivedut <br /> • the last p otest tithe percentage was now 338 did not have anrof a tot 1 saes ure t valuef <br /> Janet Stegall said a several others are planning on <br /> protesting and she felt the LIB was being pushed too fast. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.