Laserfiche WebLink
February 6,1985 43 P <br /> 11 <br /> EXECUTIVE SESSION . <br /> betaSzecepsoesian d,tof dicang nt ego[tglas a N fe ewso <br /> matGec <br /> 114 <br /> PUBLIC BEARING-NEW ZONING CATAGORIES <br /> Art K of the Planning Department,said the first five ordinances Nbeforeshe council todayes.be discussed a single public <br /> hearing, but would Sr ted on separately. Be said the Planning <br /> Commission had on these ordinances and were recommending �{ <br /> adoption by the council. <br /> in reviewing bothr n evidential and b ordinances, the <br /> staff felt there wasneed for additional Bao categories. Said <br /> s <br /> also, !here wasn't enough direction in theordinances as to the <br /> z <br /> process applicanthad to go through to obtain a <br /> rezone <br /> variance etc. These new ordinances had this explanation includedt1',`i <br /> He explained that although this came about because of the fact that R iI7( <br /> the newly annexed Silver lake area had to be resorted, the new <br /> categories will be applied throughout the city. I., <br /> The present ordinances covering Residential 2 sone allows duplex Y{�.. <br /> housing and the next sone is multiple family housing under <br /> Residential 3. The R-3 (A) multiple fa14 <br /> t ice r sidential-site plan review a the first ordinance before hecouncil today for <br /> betoval would allow a different type of house style. Something <br /> ween duplexes and multiple family dwellings, such as single <br /> family attached houses etc. I <br /> Councilman Gipson asked <br /> about too m d h density a silver Lake <br /> causing polution tothe lake water and Nr. Rot said the Plannin <br /> mmiseiohad been concerned about this and eetablishee this zone �(. <br /> that would <br /> allow from 10 to 25 unite per acre. <br /> Councilan Morrow asked if a citizen would have the right to appeal ^ <br /> the hearing examiner's decision to the council if a development were <br /> proposed that was objectionable and BruceJones,City Attorney,said <br /> he proper time for this was when the tone change was requested. <br /> President Stephenson then tom enG<d that when the Hearing E 1 kjIl dinance wa.written, the council had tdiscuesed shiers d added to ' <br /> se<t ion allowing appeal to the council at no fee. p) ' <br /> Business-Site Plan Review Zone is vera similar t -2 except 1! Y� <br /> requires a site lentreview and leo buffer adjacent to single fGl <br /> amity homes [The B-2(B)Office Perk site Plan R Zone allows } <br /> from large office complexes mall clinics o [offices, etc. ";i>[1 <br /> R-3A use are allowed in B-2(A)and 0-2(BI zones. „1: <br /> nsil Davis of 5023 Claremont N owner of property in the area, <br /> 19 <br /> suggested n Gwent Go the a-2 (Bi zoning ordinance be changinq # <br /> the wording of Sec.1.A(3 and s B. (91. Be said M1 as glad <br /> these ordinances were proposed es he B felt they amould help the q <br /> devleopment of this area. <br /> 1 <br />