Laserfiche WebLink
111 <br /> March 29,1985 <br /> • <br /> ba ad <br /> ciaLen eot tn he£k It se r n ports waimportant bu! Ghete ould <br /> a we a given said sh <br /> rsler comm ted khat Ln the Planning C n hea[Lnge f[ <br /> ir4uarters of the calendar hye Gha eMlr. G psai fthis and <br /> f true and had been left out. az and. egotre said this was <br /> councilman Gipson questthe time frame in the amended Section <br /> 19of o dinance. He <br /> .said there is n time limit set for the <br /> hearing examiner to ower the aggrieved party after hehasasked <br /> ffect baeiderat a of the a:elavon, He aakee that wo arga ee tris <br /> anaercea in cnra a:ton. <br />• <br /> 01055 t y publf:lheseoog.gue, seconded by Councilman Overstreet to tJ <br /> p[dinance endpnopone asked Lf"Ye"wished M <br /> : ak on the p sed 4 <br /> eel wed. <br /> ole la rid to cou evl vas:a.:".'"e e <br /> P• w Mi 1 ho we cept Councilmen <br /> Motion carried. <br /> COUNCIL NO.853-85 <br /> AN ORDINANCE <br /> READING: <br /> IN NOH dl dl . 692-80 ended ,l 6 <br /> Ordiof nances[ Examiner 1981 823-81 -952-83 defining'the duties <br /> Hearingandestablishing appeal procedures,• �u. <br /> Moved by Councilman seconded by <br /> Gipson <br /> that 16 be amended bymdding n additional sentence tread as follows: 'Such AY <br /> written decision shall be rendered within 15 working <br /> days f h date o£ret e <br /> request for reconsideration or in <br /> ing od. <br /> n 1 ing lheld•wlt6vn 15 ass 0 d o£kha close of the <br /> ha aggrteved party g songs[[fma.' gfF <br /> e capk en th Mog:e h 11 o calm Yn voting Y" <br /> Pose, a pelnor who war sea. <br /> Amendment carried. <br /> d ny2]u1011ended by oGdin p in kh b E Liman Overstreet that ill <br /> wh fuse aatl third quarters of n ndareyeau•e folloi„eg the F. <br /> eten::,vi-annually a eleti M1 rd al in las <br /> 11 x Called r the m endment w1 CM1 all c :limen voting y <br /> cept cilnan Pop ro Michelson who vele excused. - <br /> Amendment carried. <br />