Laserfiche WebLink
5 WWW 316 <br /> r Fix�.Ii August 21,1985 <br /> comprehensive plan, t Shoreline plan 0 argeetion a the x rng <br /> g f he h nthe <br /> � ' comprehensive 1 _the area.annexation a[a shall ft the oCity <br /> r f Everett Shoreline Raster Program and Shoreline environmental <br /> designation for the <br /> t ?�' area shall be Rural iroen <br /> the d nis to agriculturaldevelopment and <br />{ similar low intensity uses. <br /> { <br /> Cvea yicC;,12,=an Overstreet,seconded by Councilman Pope to close <br /> Y President aSStephenson asked of anyone further wished t speak and no <br /> Roll was called exeiteh all councilmen voting yea except Councilman <br /> h <br /> angus who was d. <br /> motion carried. <br /> {� <br />["{r � <br /> S !I NP rb RESOLUTION OF INTENT • <br /> R vea by it of 9 seconded by Councilman Michelson adopt <br /> eeol 1 2601 a Eo'llaws: <br /> WHEREAS, h y council has approved a for <br />{ FI} annexationh above-described property to the City of Everett and <br /> AS Sl a hearing aringo RCw <br /> 35.13.140 and due consideration of publiccomment on the petition <br /> for annexation is favorably disposed to the proposed ann nation,and <br /> WHEREAS, a <br /> a notice of pursuant to 36.9^5.090 will <br /> be filed with he Snohomish County Boundary Review B rdt 9 <br /> di [ WHEREAS, Council.may noton eproposed <br /> annexation until SnohomisheM1 County Boundary Review Board has <br /> issued a final determination on the pro o¢aannexation; <br /> ..1:91.; <br /> .1 NOW, THEREFORE, R IT RESOLVEDBy THE CITY COUNCIL OF <br /> CITY oe S T thea Snohomish my Boundary Riew Board Che <br /> adiveed that Bthe THAT <br /> City Council uis favorably disposed <br /> VBR <br /> proposed anneXation,and M1 ¢ <br /> council intends,to complete its action <br /> 4 F on the proposed after Snohomish CountyBoundary <br /> Review Board has <br /> t issued determination rmination y proposed <br /> I1 annexation. <br /> de Stephens without graphic study information before <br /> the ou President <br /> t tells h proposed u t is inappropriate f the <br /> council to vote on thus annexation ae s time. R said if the <br /> for the soccer field were told they had sto <br /> $30pro0,0 oot for a improvements,he do could handle that <br /> r and herefore street <br /> would n the doubted <br /> �I5 this happened he <br /> thought there was o use in annexing the area. <br /> RACouncilman Overstreet said <br /> it voola c ¢ n <br /> consolidate on ownership into <br /> one area and not split it between county and city which is one of <br /> n`1I,i the city's goals. <br /> g�7 <br /> 04 <br />