Laserfiche WebLink
,.j <br /> • <br /> October 16,1985 <br /> said everyone w entitled,who property rn the LID or who <br /> I is opportunity pd to ard sen[c h property o , ill b given an <br /> to be he <br /> ether a objected <br /> He <br /> askedreasons name E ee council m tici <br /> pose of this <br /> eathe proceedings andafford <br /> n odividual ieda rt the asid the sessment roll <br /> present w en 1 rspe toy sowners vb ecref a information p why <br /> Blair Burroughs of Mills and c hearing <br /> • should not <br /> designated by s statute d is dot likes other tapes ngs. <br /> process and LID and said there of <br /> several <br /> explained t can he used to an <br /> properties, but ihis <br />�' <br /> methods <br /> e e c felt the special e _ rtt od tw the n fairesas <br /> thosencitizensvbenefited hby theLIDa paying pfor it. also <br /> sed the p t figures a only and a <br /> forthe benefit o r the property owner so that <br />[ council can make an advised decision. <br /> Celia Strong, o£Public Works <br /> Department <br /> 4 impro ighway g9 (EvergreenWay)rfrom the 104th St. SW. <br /> If <br /> grid,s meth[nts to Highway t108th B.W. <br /> right of w <br />`!'. <br />'...,., said following t of the area wthe proposed osed <br /> staff invited propertyw meeting o July 2, 9 to <br /> explain timprovements to north nal Southpoint <br /> projects/and e i£thee w any interest among <br /> Mer <br /> f ' continue ty improvements along their frontage As a <br />, , smeeting,a petition w received representing 69.488 <br /> of the within the proposed district. <br /> meeting held August 13 to discuss estimated <br />,1, assessments and nn for a public hearing. <br /> In yr addition, <br /> �� aall sses property ndowners were g t 20th, t'fed by '1 poE <br /> stent n <br /> she said as of[his date,there has• been very little feed-back from <br /> the o ewho <br /> how the onProt lyin <br /> g <br /> , hest Park <br /> Road, whambenefit there would be t <br /> IIIommalyed property, which is used and has a viable <br /> future <br /> as a single family <br /> recommendation et <br /> hr property b benefit'he astaff's <br /> 1:' reflected by a preliminary amended by <br /> 1985 legislature n vides assessment <br /> the <br /> property 1 commercial. There are two <br /> Ingle later <br /> residences done <br /> • and one o occupied, <br /> al) <br /> vacant parcel,a11 commercially z on thewdt side of <br /> Olivia Park Roadwithno frontageon theproposed <br /> I improvement. these properties <br /> to t <br /> develop <br /> commercially, theyHowever, n would be rr required to acquire est to he <br /> Proposed s been a preliminary proposalhe Liberty There which would divert traffic t Evergreen Way a ead[vof <br /> an <br /> property <br /> the p developedasproposed, t benefit <br /> e final assessment property substantially greater the <br /> the <br /> • $100 the <br /> on the preliminaryroll.roll. <br /> 1< <br /> it <br />