Laserfiche WebLink
' 4I 392 <br /> ' October 16,1985 <br /> q ,I.71-III • <br /> NI ,iiiia1. payment for the improvements <br /> be made special a m to upon <br /> {��{{ the property in thedistrict,payable by h Bof''payment <br /> ', a2 ', by bonds., and roviding fora issuance d sale oflocal <br /> improvementdistrict warrants hredeema 1 aher <br /> short-term financing and local improvementdistricth bonda,r of <br /> Moved by Councilman Gangue, seconded by Councilmen M l <br /> he eon.that <br /> { this 1s declared to be he final D <br /> g of Council Bill 48518 94 <br /> and the City Clerk is directed 11 the roll for the final <br /> „p2, disposition of the ordinance. <br /> (F`r' YES: Longue,Michelson,Stephenson,Morrow <br /> 1 NAYS: Poe <br /> 5 ( E%COSan: Gipson,Overstreet <br /> j'9 1 Ordinance No.11]8-85 adopted. <br /> C ip, PUBLIC NEARING-APPEAL OP B REZONE DNS <br /> II116 ident Stephenson said this Epublic hearing wason the appeal rezone Tap, Determination of Noneignrficance issued for he Solis/Johnson r e <br /> pub for a comprehensive plan change and rezone from R-1, Single Family <br /> �) Low Density Residential o eR 3, Multiple Family L Density <br /> ,�✓ Residential for Parcel A (9 a ee) and to C-1, General oC ial <br /> for Parcel E (13.finacres)of The <br /> e32 6.Dacre <br /> ehsite is located onorth of <br /> 14/Ir TOFFS aFoods,east a e e o o way. <br /> 1{{ Ne said more clearly stated is that the R' m <br /> eaponale official, the <br /> Jt��tm <br /> anning Director, has determined that I a not necessary <br /> because there la nothing <br /> in this project that is significant enough <br /> ry{ to require an EIS. he council will have to decide if the <br /> ' .5 Responsible Official's decision is correct or whether there should <br /> be an EIS. The merits of t rezone t to be discussed during <br /> 'I,11 e' this public Z hearing, only the <br /> the magnitude of the project requires an Ie <br /> ' p <br /> ncilman Morrow asked when there will be times when the citizens <br /> Y.;II,' can disease the rezone and plane. <br /> } +�o <br /> etuc one,, ity Attorney,said the actual hearingfor the.rezone <br /> ,!6{ has not been scheduled at this time because of the ps oceedin.being <br /> held f ight. Those hearings will be held before the Planning <br /> Commission and before the council. Tonights hearing is because,as <br /> i IL ISI.. resident Stephenson said,the Responsible Official issued afor <br /> the Belle/Johnson He B said the city has to conform DNS <br /> he <br /> 1984 amendments State <br /> Environmental Policy Act. 0 o the <br /> requirements of M1 t was that there would be One <br /> one <br /> appeal step, rat or three. The city ordinance sates <br /> that n appeal shall b d to the ring Examiner but this would <br /> make St o p appeal so thHearing Examinerdeclined <br /> urisdiction and,f On the appeal ons before is council. <br /> �I jurisdiction <br /> emphaarsed t 11 discussion shoube o the EISorlackof, <br /> { • <br /> [[ rather than anything on the merits of the resone. <br /> If ,' Cl the Planning Department,said the council has three <br /> III. possible actions tonight. would be to affirm thedetermination <br /> of non significance issued b the Planning D Responsible <br /> Official for the city. by <br /> mould be t e project to <br /> I. thestaffto genera specific[additional info Statement. <br /> third, <br /> 22 recommend preparation of•the Environmental Impact Sm <br />