My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1985/10/23 Council Minutes
>
Council Minutes
>
1985/10/23 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2020 11:22:14 AM
Creation date
9/29/2020 7:19:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Minutes
Date
10/23/1985
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
401 <br /> October 23,1985 <br /> NAVY FISCAL IMPACT <br /> ALYsIs <br /> • <br /> mayor Moore AN Ada jthat the P Impact Analysis:from the <br /> Office OTra c ling delivered <br /> today. a o0 or statedmeth was boas appointing c .m ens) <br /> committee valutate the analysis, re 'City[citizens) <br /> findincommmittee memberss and ommend a safollowslan f mitigation and negotiation. The <br /> First National Bank <br /> �n <br /> C •indy a <br /> ttc9 <br /> e Company <br /> • <br /> Rich Toyer, <br /> Bill Wright,Labor. <br /> Steve Burr,'Port Gardner Information League <br /> Ablby ene �Diam natn Fluke C mp • <br /> Kurt eloeser,Bizet Interstate Bank <br /> Peggy Stevenson, <br /> Scott Paper CompRetired <br /> Company t <br /> R alive <br /> e0j,ouera Everett�CityC cid <br /> M then introduced Charles Ellington, Western <br /> Director 0 of t Office of a Adjustment presentation not <br /> the.fiscal Impact A alyeis,Economic cEllington.introduced D Robert.. <br /> Director Cofn the Defenses Department's Office ofr <br /> Adjustment presented <br /> and reviewed the `Fiscal x Economic <br /> xevrt Carriertethat t Romeportin'e sa Everett,p w shington•. <br /> 1)identifytthe political jurisdictions likely to impact ii <br /> ted additional population by jurisdiction a <br /> estimate <br /> navy-related tlfiscal impact of eel navy-related population and <br /> comparing additional revenues with sae demands. <br /> that analysis identified political <br /> butisdiclttionc se expected tot a significantly impaaccteedt by t Na <br /> [.fiscal b impact• i defined he of Navy <br /> of income with its obligations <br /> comparison t theNavy-relatedpopulation. <br /> The figures the willt used <br /> sharing a mitigating the <br /> stressed tt <br /> begin the <br /> t initial figures determined with o <br /> negotiations nthe <br /> evidence <br /> a •vailable a the time.a The analysis affords en eXplicitr <br /> which t deliberate ways t the public e n • <br /> point <br /> hel cal',, e,and federal governments and the private sector, g <br /> Congress <br /> aauthorize.funding t s mitigate t costs LE it is <br /> determined t n <br /> unfair.a burden is placed on the <br /> ' <br /> political jurisdiction which v e sdo ee•rin Bangor, Wash gton: Xing. <br /> Bay,Georgia and Cheyenne,Wyoming. <br /> Councilman Gipson asked if each agencY orjur should <br /> nagotta[e toes[ needs separately or if the negotiations i should be <br /> woe collectively. <br /> stated that a united a collective a the part of <br /> the jurisdictions would be more effective in the effort <br /> a <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.