Laserfiche WebLink
January B,1986 11 ,y. <br /> CouncilmanIll.I <br /> Stephensonn e with the <br /> enforcement � <br /> ordinances arc ase dy s do not nq <br /> Council involved <br /> nnk Council. Other the enforcement.council and Y Be feels that that <br /> .{ <br /> enforcement issue is an administrative one. . <br /> Rob Eubanks, Burlington North4 t d that the funds ft bridge <br /> replacement have been made availablehe states by the federal <br /> ve•nmen of the requirements of applying,f these funds <br /> mandate that One <br /> city o take title ridges. This ; � <br /> requitement re M1 town <br /> has 1 over. The <br /> railroad is willing to pay half of the balance f the funds required <br /> for rebuilding afterh grant funds have been received., The <br /> railroad offered these funds from the1 1 g of the bridge repair 1,111 I <br /> or replacement discussions. <br /> banksalso tthe standards that incorporated <br /> into this ordinance a new bridges and new gradecrossings end <br /> never have applied to existing crossings. Theit o <br /> bridges re the11 i road b t C t f tl <br /> p bility f her'entt LHe-stated h <br /> was <br /> asu the f the position of the railroad that the proposed d.ordinance <br /> as a <br /> o y's police poxat. <br /> Councilman Stephenson expressed concern that nothing x moving o <br /> the negotiations d that oefurtner ahead solving the <br /> issuethe replacementof the Oakes and Lombard brldgee. <br /> He safety, sed the consideration should Abe given' public <br /> Counci1 Pope <br /> ae` are ed in e railroad's opinion t what standards <br /> threethe t Bridges todayi. <br /> Glen Howell,Burlington Northern,stated that the bridges needed to <br /> be replaced. ridges would probably comply with 1908 I <br /> standards due to the replacement of a wood decking owith concrete. <br /> cxlman Langueh asg ed when x the 1 C time <br /> pairs x e done mc <br /> he�bridgea end c s inga'+ - c <br /> • <br /> o a <br /> Howell stated that in his recollection the last <br /> done in September October, They T 1983. W -read [o were <br /> II <br /> wreplacement <br /> Ct'� <br /> additional repairs in February of 1984 but told by the y to <br /> put the repairs on hold due t the need f a lacement of t ',. <br /> bridges. Be alsostated that.makingrepairs <br /> o `these bridgeswas <br /> like beating a dead horse as even with repairs to <br /> would be to <br /> current The <br /> standards. Th railroad has been prepared to repair the rI <br /> en f£ot ic grade <br /> tiltasi gbut rt to has been put on hole due to the <br /> ved by C ncllman Cephanaenr seconded by M"cmilman Overstreet t <br /> tabl hi hell 6111 ror 30'd y o 1 <br /> Mau tate her 1E thisbill was tabled that negotiations <br /> would be delayed for[thirty y -he will not meet with the t <br /> I <br /> railroad without this <br /> soma £safety standards <br /> Ni` <br /> . <br /> 7 <br /> N F, <br />