Laserfiche WebLink
• <br /> January 22,1986 <br /> 3> <br /> Councilman Overstreet was excused at this time. iii <br /> Gey`Ervine n hearing concerned t `� <br /> comprehensive <br /> plan tchangeseufh zoning <br /> changeson <br /> t Malljacentwparc f land [ <br /> ched anges S nn o£Dv n two Way. 4'ti� <br /> Lloyd Solis a requesting a comprehensive elan Designation Change !f{it^' <br /> afor a ndg QaEverett <br /> arcettvenerally located west of the ePUD right-of-Way r <br /> 15-25 northdweo ng ver to p wavy from Open Space to Multiple.Family, <br /> Change would allow for a acomprehensiveunit congregate <br /> Plan a ignition i <br /> for senior cvtisens with as twenty <br /> lE 3 L wide green belt adjacent facility <br /> the Plat of Mountain view. A i 1 <br /> Single.Family Low Density Residential t 3Multipled P Family RL +[ <br /> Density Residential with Contract which restricts the <br /> elderly care facility and requires review of design features.. an <br /> Alan Johnson 1s requesting a Comprehensive Plan Deeignacion-change �I <br /> for a 13.6, r parcel generally located east of the OD ,..k <br /> right-of-way,way, ae north of Everett Mall Way f p Spate POD <br /> 99 <br /> Business/Lightallow Commercial. The. comprehensive1 hangs would d� <br /> proposed business offices and commercial M1 p rezonele also requested f 1 Single Family L Density Residential to <br /> C-1 1 Commercial with Contract which eof features through an administrative site planreviewp[eceee, �{( <br /> {Jy3y3 <br /> M[. Ervine reviewedthe chronology of °Vent. leading p co this <br /> Public bearing. h li ante made application 1n dune of 1985 and SSSSSS <br /> neighborhood meeting was held in July. Two public hearings In <br /> November b d were Comprehensive <br /> by the Planningis.... The <br /> Planning U 1 Commissionrecommends approval of the ompreheneive Plan <br /> G8 <br /> ig a Changes and the Resonex. <br /> [ ales stated khat 92nd Street eW mould not be opened to <br /> ehlcle aE raPflc but would be improved for pedest[tan ecce nly. <br /> CoUt time nc ilmenrequest eked ifthe tion ofplthents 92nd Strsback at a[ght of way later <br /> II, <br /> maintain a pedestrian veccess easement. Streetan <br /> ncllnan Morrow asked iE the P right of-way had been considered i E <br /> fn light rail vee In the fu[u[e]D <br /> Councilman Siva asked if any type of parke xpansion had been I d <br /> d considered for this area] <br /> d <br /> ke Mr. Ervine stated, according to Parks Department, that 5 <br /> allot he park he higher he c er the <br /> he <br /> would have some information cost <br /> a epossible use of fiche that <br /> aa right-of-way for elight rail by this evening's meeting, p <br /> Y Councilman pe-stated that maybe the Council should consider <br /> additional wording in than <br /> an agreement regarding the <br /> vacationf 92nd Street d thepossibility f parkexpansionin py�� <br /> that area. <br /> eu Ali• <br />'v7 <br />