1986/01/22 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

•..... III 41 January 22,19116 . • . , . rg701:74.recessed at 11,35 a.m. to be reconvened at 700 p.m. • . , . , ,.. • • .. PUBLIC BEARING(Continued) • • president Gipson reconvened the public hearing on the Solie/Johnson • comprehensive Plan Change and Pazove and stated that Gerry Ervine of . . the City Planning Staff would give a review of the process and then '" • anyone who wished to speak on the issue would he given an . opportuhity to do so. . Gerry Ervine stated that the public hearing was to be on two ,,, • comprehensive plan changes and tel zoning changes on two adjacent . parcels of land located in South Everett north of Everett Mall Way. The Lloyd Solite property is referred Cl as Parcel•A•a.the Alan Johnson property is referred to as Parcel°V. '•. . . .. • •.,. Lloyd Solie Cl requesting a Comprehensive Plan Designation Change for(Parcel.A.),a 9-acre parcel generally located west of the PUD right-of-way and north of Everett Mall Way from Open Space to I'I Multiple Family, 15-25 dwelling units per acre. The comprehensive Plan Designation- Change would-allow for a proposed 123 unit . congregate care facility for senior citizens with a twenty foot wide ..• green belt adjacent to the Plat Cl Mountain View. A rezone is also -• requested from R-1, Single Family Low Density Residential to R-3, Multiple Family Low Density Residential with Contract which • restricts the use to an elderly facility • requires review of design featurescongregate care and. A• Alan Johnson is requesting a Comprehensive Plan Designation change for (Parcel .1)01,a 13.6 acre parcel generally located east of the- pus,),,,t-or-wey,and north of Everett Mall Way from Open Space to 0- Business/Light Commercial. The Comprehensive Plan Change would -II allow for proposed business offices and commercial shops. A rezone . • is also requeeted from R-1,Single Family Low Density Residential Cl .1 C-1, General Commercial with Contract which requires review of •. design features through an administrative site plan reView proCees. Or. Ervine stated that he had contacted the Puget Sound.Council of • Governments regarding the use of the PUD right-of-way as a pessihle ' ., route for mass transit light rail from Everett to Seattle. PSC00 . advised Er. Ervine that route had been reviewed and was not being recommendedas a light rail route at this time. It is unlikely that •" • it would be used for light rail. , .• . • Mr. Ervin.,stated that the negotiation between the applicants and '• ._ the POD for improvement of the right-of-way to just begl,,and this • could be a lengthy process. The rezone would be null and void if '. the applicants cannot come to agreement with the PUD for access. . . , .. . Myron Crow,9309 10th Avenue SE, spoke against the rezone and comp ••' plan changes. He stated that no more traffic or.noise could be • tolerated in the neighborhood. Re stated there was already too mu. commercial slevelopment in the area and he and his family moved.Into ,1 the neighborhood eXpecting the subject ProPertY to he aDvel°Ped 1150 single family residences as is allowed under the current zoning. • • • • • ,. . . .. . • . ' • . • 0'. . • .. • . . .... .