Laserfiche WebLink
14;1 <br /> ,I 107 I n� <br /> 1'1 <br /> March 12,1906 <br /> 111, <br /> , <br /> D <br /> wavedby 1 Gipson, y Councilmanp authorize r <br /> for comuter f M1 1 bn <br /> Works ill i d p Library; public.administrative Public II <br /> to 6 00 pril 17,1986. I ,I <br /> Councilman p neon asked it all of the unitsbeing g d ; t <br /> wouldb outdated y 1f they h y p d d 1' <br /> 1 1 <br /> be upgraded. 1 ilities Division, stated h 11 <br /> e equipment requested d d he specifications have th city Y, <br /> o b upgraded expanded, y ill M1 *stand lone' <br /> opacity. f{ <br /> Roll was called-with all councilmenvoting yea except Councilmen <br /> Langus and Overstreetwere excused. 11 <br /> .. . canted. <br /> Motion i,.... <br /> APPEAL1'11 111 <br /> 1 <br /> I <br /> Don weod, planning Department, this is an appeal of <br /> condition 1n the approval of to subdivision application which <br /> requires each duplex nit to provide a one cat garage for each 1'1 i <br /> nit. The plat is'Pine Te[[a a Plat and is located between Pine <br /> Street and 12th nd 13th Streets. This is a six lot duplex <br /> subdivision. A Pu blic Hearingwas held before the Bearing Examiner <br /> n e 21, 1984and approval <br /> for the subdivision was granted on I'. <br /> July 12, 1984. as consideration w requested on July 26, 1984 and <br /> was denied on August 3, 1984. The apply y n/Robinette tt( 1 <br /> appealed <br /> n. vto minerthe x economic conditions he tamers& d 11 <br /> 's decision and re6 <br /> applicantd p h construction f dwellings the <br /> tt <br /> this 1 was requested before 11 <br /> The applicant now wishes to be in a position to imprOve the property 14 i <br /> and b d that hrequirement h garage be removed �V <br /> from the plat approval. he Searing Examiner placed authority <br /> for this requirement as the State Environmental Policy Act. <br /> WWood stated the City has now ted a newsingle familyoliey :.I <br /> hicthe applicant could do the construction under which would no <br /> require-the nclusion of garages with e b duplex unit, <br /> sty wish t, 2722 olbu Avenue, representing thepPlvcant, I'- <br /> stated the c 9 fired e r garages with other duplex <br /> units an singles family residences a being he in the <br /> immediate d neigborhood. hats this requirement is in conflict with <br /> what as currently being built. <br /> • Richard Boyden, 1429 Broadway, stated that thisis 1 <br /> not consistentwith the neighborhood. e dd of <br /> e garages onlincreases cost the dwelling.unit whichds <br /> increase the cost o the purchaser [the f the unv HeL• d it was his understanding that the City's single family �V..._t. <br /> policy <br /> also required that affordable housing be m available all <br /> Evetett,Citizens find this project would C only improve the I' <br /> neighborhood but provide affordable housing stock. <br />