Laserfiche WebLink
119 <br /> I, III <br /> MereM1 Ie,1986 <br /> deveto of the capital improvement oceee. The committee would ;� II. <br /> he composed of a member from the Museum Committee,othe m [Planning 'XI <br /> Commission, the Library Board, the Police Advisory Board, the ParkIII <br /> soar the Senior enter Board. re would <br /> be two councilmen r;, <br /> the committeeaappointed by the President five citizens a <br /> large,t and <br /> appointed by the fiveo councilmen. The committee II <br /> would <br /> would t n bring back the process Por[council review and approval,te <br /> d by C ncllmas Pope,a onaed by C ncllman Lan''' <br /> to concur rn <br /> thaeprapoeal as presented by Mr.Gipson. 6!! I <br /> Roll was lea with all Councilmen voting yes except Councilman F; <br /> Morrow whoowas excused. {,hl <br /> 1 <br /> Motion carried. 1 Iy <br /> COUNCIL COMMENTdIi' <br /> Councilman Stephenson,Budget Committee chairman,said the committee <br /> 14`til, <br /> had atecusaea he jail fees in the meeting this mo ming. The city t <br /> h been paying the 1984 rata t than the current rate, until <br /> h has a a review of the entire situation regarding double V y <br /> taxation. No conclusion bas been reached but there is a difference uN7�dk <br /> E 610,588 between the 1984 rates paid by the city and the currentF4 <br /> charge under the 1985 schedule. (G II 'I,�t <br /> The c recommending h C city <br /> t rhis esolve pay toam nt 1{/ <br /> Issue to <br /> councilman <br /> contingent the upon <br /> setting <br /> p fttl 9 1 M1 h unty o ve the <br /> council's Overstreet asked what PnrPose thiauld have as the city � <br /> hes been unable toe[up any meetings for over a year. ' ,�I <br /> Councilman dive sale if the cite m <br /> paid this, it might be a step to <br /> kee [ ✓1 <br /> p the cooperation with he cou She <br /> w <br /> said right no the � . <br /> city la working cooperatively 1 with the and this shouldAI <br /> h process. <br /> questionIn answer to a g a <br /> ding.the issue, Bruce Jones, CityI Y" <br /> Attorney said there 1 1 prohibits the county from setting <br /> f but the city k [ <br /> wat t county <br /> ionale the c my u e for <br /> tting the jail fees,specifically what percentage of the property3;. <br /> tax is used. <br /> Roved y 1 Langue seconded by Councilman P concur illI'ly <br /> he L recommendation and pay the 810,588 Pope contingent upon <br /> he city setting up a meeting to resolve the issue of double i <br /> taxationh council's satisfaction III <br /> Councilman Overstreet felt the authorisation to issue money does not <br /> 1 <br /> keep in line with the resolve of the council in the last few months. <br /> Councilman Step so felt the city has been working with the c linty FPIN fi 99 <br /> on and nby paying with he understanding <br /> 1 v q <br /> hey swillisic ed and talk about them jail fees, it x111 help p f IC <br /> he cooperation going. f ; <br /> 0220e[reet who voted noaand Councilmen Norrov who was cox useduncilman 'I I'' <br /> Motion carried. 1 t <br /> 6;118 <br /> f 4 <br /> lkrf . <br />