Laserfiche WebLink
121 I 1 i{l' ,I <br /> March 26,1986 't <br /> 120 Street ' II <br /> restII <br /> 32,739.84 12,599.43 20,140.41 8,358.88 <br /> 130 Manpower P1 11110000 00.00 00.00 00.00 00.00 <br /> 130 Manpower P1 11110001 448.00 86.33 361.67 177.77 IS <br /> 1 <br /> 132 Golf 9,211.08 3,849.47 5,361.61 2,365.72 <br /> 153 B e[envy Med Svcs 18,930.93 10,630.21 8,300.72 1,547.27 <br /> 0 <br /> 198 Cu Rlk Grants ,780.49 2,674.56 4,105.93 1,696.19 1 <br /> 401 Utilities 93,009.86 4],]47.01 45.,262:85 22,678.68 <br /> 425 Transit 66,709.O4 29,485.32 37,223.72 17,463.83 <br /> 501 equip Rental 20,854.68 9,395.51 11,459.17 5,244.91 <br /> 503 N rs Comp.Self Incur 00.00 00.00 00.00 3,0''5.18 I <br /> CITY TOTALS 8 886,757.36$391,340.34$ 495,417.02 8158,244.51 <br /> � <br /> ' <br /> VI <br /> Roll was called with all councilmen voting yes except Councilman <br /> Morrow who was excused. 1h <br /> Motion carried. 1 °I <br /> Isi <br /> ROAD JURISDICTION STUDY RECOMMENDATIONS ` <br /> d I <br /> Pat McClain of Administration said the.State Road Jurisdiction 88 <br /> 81 <br /> Committee is doing a study commissioned by the 1983 legislature to 1�III1 <br /> review the existing roadway jurisdictions 1n an effort o determine 7 <br /> whether the present system beet serve the.public o£the state,and ) 81 <br /> I I' <br /> to develop a specific process which would serve as the basis far )''ll'''I y <br /> urisalctional hanges in the future. <br /> Each city is being given an o portunity is ubeit recommendation.t I <br /> the RoadJurisdicion Technical Subcommittee for jurisdictional ii lol'] <br /> changes either from city to state jurisdiction e[vice versa The <br /> case sought <br /> textension oaSR2 from 5 t the <br /> sought to returnBR529 (Broadway) from proposednavy <br /> oto It OP <br /> 41st St. The ciy's response indicated we pportive of 111X.`� <br /> assuming responsibility for the bridges and d' Y <br /> Snohomish River and sloughs. The city did not b] to accepting (II <br /> Broadway in town. yypp81 <br /> 4 <br /> Compromise gives the city a route from 15 at Marysville, through (IR I <br /> the waterfront and back o 1-5 at Pacific. WBDOT will maintain fi I$0 <br /> SR529 from1-5 Marysville and across the Snohomish Rive[ Bridge, <br /> along H aline View Drive oining SR2 at the base. The city V <br /> proposal t d SR2 along Pacific Ave a Rucker and W. Marine 1 <br /> View Drive was ts accepted.l Recommendationsn willbeforwarded to the G" <br /> full Road Jurisdiction Committee later this summer and eventually be <br /> part of their package of changes for the '87 Legislature. Re 7t f 4 4i NN <br /> commended that council concurwith the plan. I I <br /> neire:r Pope, se andel by Councilman StepM1ansan <br /> ooncdr.ito the moonm.enaaeion.a cO 88 d <br /> Councilmanv <br /> o asked if the TAC had reviewed this and Mr. V 1 <br /> ..clain <br /> saidthey,reviewed and approved the original proposal but I - <br /> had not seen the compromise. <br /> wed by Co04011 an Overstreet,se onded by C ncilman Stephenson to 1 .F�' <br /> able hetion and request he T review the compromise and 7 <br /> come back with a recommendation to council. rl iI,L':..I <br />