Laserfiche WebLink
315 171 <br /> Aug 13,1986 �.,. <br /> 4: �e <br /> priority gfiva categories,, The b 1 philosophy is a simple <br /> buy onlyhat you need and buy the cheapest first. <br /> Conservation of buildings <br /> decentralized [ and '... <br /> a be per into a the northwest. Conservation <br /> needsbe'a lost uo icy unless this is done at t unless <br /> the building ell' right at the beginning,he uch more <br /> expensive <br /> and r sometimes impossible <br /> to gel those[energy sawlogs <br /> later. Conservation should be d by 1 the citizens in he <br /> northwest,made available toall builders. <br /> Conservation rage of 80 Per kw hoer a <br /> demosee[etlon50 the <br /> coals'oe nuclea avpower. H said <br /> there <br /> are <br /> projects t show the feasibility o£t <br /> There will <br /> be more inform on coming in also. Early <br /> option of he a clearly avoid any surcharge costa. Early <br /> adoption also would lock in the long <br /> berm gains. said there was <br /> tributary of the Columbia River tat[em o be dammed P{: <br /> end more <br /> river,as the riverof conservation. The n to <br /> Coulee <br /> Dan 1s in the walls, windows ands appliances of new homes in lithe (.' <br /> northwest. <br /> Councilman Stephenson asked where has conservation <br /> come since the <br /> 1980 act specifically in terms of killowets per square foot, and <br /> where will MC8 .brio h ityy <br /> Mr. Lee said.the ion be peed.was how much the building I {' <br /> practice has evoly d over time in response to eCOnOmiC changes as ry� <br /> well as changes 1n regulations and building codes d he said the tra <br /> have is because'it is difficult to s et enough hood rmation as hones t monitor nuld <br /> and <br /> sample. He said there was quite a <br /> widerange of performance among <br /> new homes and they felt the M.would and <br /> lower the average consumption <br /> of electricity by approximately 608 an he number they used in he <br /> 1983 plan was 2 kw hours per square foot per year. s they gained (y'� <br /> nore experience they found that MC8 usage would net lower the level 77 <br /> quite a much a he numbers are still in a preliminary stage 2;4 <br /> but the numbers care somewhere betweenr3 end 3 102 kw hrs.per square �£ <br /> foot per year.. that, <br /> Councilman Niva asked if the threat of surcharge was real and why <br /> the imposition of the MC8 had been changed from 1986 to 1989] }}} <br /> o said in 1983 the original target for <br /> the implementation of <br /> the MCS was January 1986,but as a result of deliberations when they <br /> were working.on a new plan,they changed the date to January, 1989, <br /> Oich perhaps created he impression they would back away from <br /> the imposition of an <br /> unpopular measure. However it x the fact (�. <br /> that building was going much slower than wharf n anticipated <br /> because of the ion t stat went through,was the 1986 } } <br /> implementation date was changed to 1989.a <br /> Councilman Niva.asked if the city waited until a the University {,'1 <br /> of Washington study had been completed,leted,could thecity adopt the NCB ,La <br /> Without the surchargeand he said that question should a of Dick <br /> Matson when be spoke.Councilmn Morrow <br /> information m wail ble'ed as with sothe 'few houses occupied,shoeld wait <br /> itmore was ' <br /> difficult to gain knowledge on this. <br /> 1 <br />