Laserfiche WebLink
d <br /> 313 1 i ii <br /> Aug 13,1986y <br /> III <br /> councilman t <br /> asked why, through MCS incentives, <br /> peoplebeing vpaid rtoreduce kw hours and yet MP trying to sell �;: <br /> Berwage[ e A he <br /> e power. r. egio in the nee[tern[here as a surplus <br /> say <br /> sore <br /> taxer now,but if the region n e,as tome yearseconomic studies say <br /> will will, <br /> tm ghere o out and perhaps ten war fifteen yearn from o BPA <br /> ouch m expensive than buy <br /> oxer. The next power purchased l x111 b ry, <br /> power pronow, <br /> ice would <br /> vary e coat. <br /> If the surplus„oxer a trying <br /> be cold n ulddecision the revenue 4 ;: <br /> balanceeituation a they e[ ryln9 n make a decision that vould 8,' <br /> balance the system 1n the long term,[o <br /> Councilman Overstreet then said there was some talk that the <br /> o heat exchange might b eliminated by BPA as a requirement and <br /> rif theegula city did adopt bowthey <br /> would this reduction fir into the city's <br /> regulation. said they w trying with <br /> t data et far a <br /> current home performance i fthe comparison with N 6l homes and that data <br /> is prctice homin.es <br /> said one n of the earliest they thought <br /> is that current <br /> practice appee e e bulli r than what they t aught they w <br /> If this Happens,stay <br /> a d with <br /> r changed,the city would be granted <br /> the right t cents t C regulations and incentives or <br /> move to the new cincentive program. <br /> x6 <br /> Councilman Stephenson questioned 1f the data is n why <br /> should the council discus.this today a wager complete <br /> finalitywas a sin the whole question sof e t homes built <br /> and homes kbullt u d this would always true but he <br /> felt <br /> the city could make MCS <br /> decision today with the information <br /> available.a .,1 <br /> Councilman N asked i£ there would be m n for the j '! <br /> legislature Siva <br /> there wouldn't be t <br /> . changes of <br /> deadlines, said by 1988 therewould be much more <br /> information available for them. <br /> Dick weteon, Director o[ thes e ington Energy Office <br /> expressed <br /> support for.early adoptionof the M The adoption o <br /> thm codecompromise between the council end the master <br /> builders the c d <br /> a good c saving 50 to 609 of the <br /> a <br /> energy c s compromise x that a lid placed the <br /> adoption ao£more o <br /> stringent codes by local jurisdictions with the <br /> provision of early adoption. element e s the study to be <br /> made by t [city of Washingtonswwth the results to be.given t <br /> the legislature Ver a301ng c the M <br /> they a eking d cost <br /> fResidential D Program <br /> as to the extra costa of incentive pay to the builders e is correct.sHexfeels etc is seeifthe <br /> He said the situation here in Everett and Snohomish my is <br /> considerably more favorable for implementing the M u of the <br /> GOODSuper Program, there already S <br /> applies familiar with building h are <br /> way. said contractors <br /> felt <br /> the Residential Demonstration a Used He <br /> higher than what it mactually ken otoabuild a MCS home. <br /> said the <br /> State Energy Office supporta the University o£ Washington test <br /> Prego <br /> am and said it will add another brick t 119'x011 of knowledge <br /> t <br /> performance of residential buildings. t is a detailed case <br /> udy of t e performance of o e particular design built <br /> tliffe[ant 1 oP a orgy efficiency located in o set of occupant <br /> behavior associated witM1 It. n that case[t re a limited teat. <br />