|
' • -' 1
<br />. ,
<br /> 11
<br /> 11 11 1 352
<br /> September 3,1986
<br /> article. He said the administration and Councilmen Overstreet,
<br /> Stephenson and Morrow had beer,working with the oountY trYing to
<br /> .,,. , move toward a solution and he aaid they had great confidence in the
<br /> elected public officials, but there seem to be a great disparity
<br /> f I between the public officials eleCted in these positions and wAere
<br /> 8,1 8' the staff is going which causes the city great concern. The problem
<br /> being there seems to be two different directions on the county side.
<br /> 1 111'I ' He said he didn't believe the City of Everett or other cities should
<br /> forfeit their control of the necessary decisions in the costs of the
<br /> •
<br /> . ,.1 1' solid waste disposal. He said the city was a big partner in this
<br /> 1'1., and yet control has been lost in the planning or procedure or
<br /> .2,11 8 , process of this. Timing is very important and the City of Everett
<br /> '18 111: L I should move quickly to protect the intereets of the citizen.and to
<br /> minimize the costs and keep
<br /> 1the tipping fees at.VerY mioimum.
<br /> ..1.1,8,, ,,i
<br /> 1 He said the city would continue to work with tM county, but all
<br /> other options have to be explored. He said with the concurrence of
<br /> the solid waste committee he was going to ask the MASCO Co. to
<br /> 11"i111 4 bl''11144 study tve existing county comprehensive plan for solid waste
<br /> disposar in Snohomish County and to recommend to the City of
<br /> Everett, and to the other cdtdes, any such changes that are
<br /> T. ilI 11118:1!!1111 necessary to restore the planning deciaion ability regarding the
<br /> city's disposal of garbage. Also to request EsASCO to st.dY other
<br /> options the city may pursue. An option may be found that is much
<br /> .-.A1', ',t11111 less expensive for the City of Everett's citisens.
<br /> '',I,,t1,130 I Fie said the city has extended itself to the county, enoh as giving
<br /> I! #-. . money for the construction of the jail, Signing in es a partner in
<br /> the jail so they could receive state money,etc. The city does not
<br /> find that extension coming back to the city. for this reason be
<br /> I'' 1 ' . felt be had to pursue all options to protect the citizens of Everett
<br /> 18 18111111• , and other cities also. ,
<br /> .:,1!111.11'11)1'1 Councilman Overstreet concurred with the Mayor's conclusions and
<br /> felt they were within his right of admini.tration to authorize
<br /> 18i1' 1.0'I
<br /> MASCO to do this. He also suggested another meeting with the
<br /> County Council to discuss this and other issues as well.
<br /> :8141 1 .1
<br /> Councilman Stephenson also agreed with the Mayor's conclusions and
<br /> that there would not be a plant built that did not meet
<br /> environmental standards so be thought there was no need for more
<br /> :f0L:2::!e:a!!!:':o::::::ubseed1::::i:11::d. if'eces"'Y
<br /> c',111 i,11,381
<br /> 811,;'.11411
<br /> 1118.11H41181pM
<br />. 11:,1' ',1.8111D PRESIDENT'S COMMENTS
<br /> '18 18 0,8 0
<br /> President Gipson said a request had been made to delay Items 6 If
<br /> go they would be deleted from the agenda today. Also Item f17,the
<br /> .1. ' .11,110 l' budget hearing had been placed on the agenda today in error,that it
<br /> 111:1111L/F,,1111' vmuld be held next week.
<br />•!,:11'I [1.48,11,
<br /> ---lIeggedr:ttt'la:tecorueneil"11:ting'traeill 7ffn1t11:Pg:ucotunacil:::
<br /> ,e l., 18.,: . and asked for a motion.
<br /> 1'1 11,81 , 1
<br /> I fil11,1,0 '
<br /> tr.rl 1.111111,1 11 1
<br /> 1 14'11,r,11i,11
<br /> !N1..:11'1'11'11,
<br />
|