Laserfiche WebLink
1� is <br /> <90 <br /> 1 f November 19,1986 <br /> 1 f q11, Mr.£404198introduced the following ex6SGlta for consideration: <br /> 1.j,,,r S..f 1. Letter of Appeal <br /> IABivEicnmNaP� k t 3. ermnto <br /> n oN <br /> o <br /> -S <br /> lfa <br /> ance IDSt <br /> SNa( fI 5• Excerpts from <br /> State Environmental Policy Tet ( S <br /> EPT) <br /> Rules WAC 1L-11 <br /> E ��t 6. 198TrafficTipe <br /> ), 6a and Public Comments <br /> 8. Preliminary Project Hawing <br /> 9• Parcel map showinc locations photos were taken from <br /> g � 10. Letter <br /> LetioaidnnisoWinifred M [own <br /> addressed to <br /> ItCouncil P eGipson <br /> [ handles tated there are four alternative.which are available <br /> to Council Ellie appeal: <br /> Idldld <br /> J ) 1Remand <br /> msAffirm the ecterminetion of Non-Significance <br /> 111 1{ I' <br /> information <br /> de.<L to staff to generate specific additional <br /> I (�3 p 63. end preparation of o Environmental Impact <br /> Statement ISIS) <br /> r additional findings and based those finding., <br /> `{ .vise the Determination of NOD-Significance.Mary/10169028 re0iewed the neighborhood,the proposed project site <br /> and the vlexs xith a elide p[eeenGa[Son and descriptions. <br /> II 1 '� Councilman Overstreet asked hat the maximum height 118116tlone are <br /> ,[II11 for this area and zoning. Cunningham stated it 18 35 feet but <br /> Il{F'I III'. the applicant has agreed to®a maximum height of approximately IS <br /> 41 y feet on this Project. <br /> I summarizedb in9 the kroposal S pli a and va <br /> '� � consistent s filtheC p M1 sive Plan dears t1 f the area. <br /> 44 4I. The proposal is i compliance adsrder,,s t with beasses zoning I l,� ;, designation. Thep j o an <br /> devil pm da d project <br /> meets <br /> h multiple f pals d loof the <br /> in the City over the lent five Yeers. ThenPl1 t has been <br /> cooperative in working with the staff and the neighborhood an trying <br /> I :I to mitigate L Impacts h havebraised <br /> he <br /> Planning 1 that thea h issued implements the <br /> lanblisbed and does <br /> 11`4 E1I the mitigation i iga io policy use f impacts tdirection o theymaximumt reasonable extet possible. <br /> 1ry�4t n S1 esker of the apartment complex would create <br /> II 1J,1 )1• additional drainage problems. <br /> It` I ,handles saidthat lk his complex would create additional drainage <br /> 1 ( s drainage ordinance, significant drainage <br /> Rk, requirements have <br /> established o thisproject to handle any <br /> I) runoff createdeby City's <br /> apartmentcomplex. <br /> ��5� William Puller, 3625 Geyer Lane, theappellant stated-he had <br /> t, i., view. He <br /> the expressedconcern <br /> nc rnM1e hatextband had property also <br /> v lues aid fwill or that <br /> be <br /> 1°1'f' decreased.with restricted cview.t He stated there was no met an <br /> the DN [ding fireplaces and their emissions.gas <br /> Chian Project <br /> 4 1s c ted there will be 20 fireplaces. He reviewed the other <br /> �1 s4 issues sae stated in has appeal. <br /> I �F t <br />