Laserfiche WebLink
71,7 <br /> 515 <br />• December 5,1986 • <br /> not allowed under the current <br /> Commercial Zoning(C-1). The <br /> proposal is to thezoning map foreb <br /> the...ter property andthe <br /> Icel adjacent t Rhesouth to Heavy Commercial-Light Industrial <br /> C-2)with contracts. <br /> He said M[.Webster t came in last year andapplied for a permit to �,i <br /> enlarge his shop and et that tine found that property x s not <br /> red for his type o operation. The staff has been workingwith <br /> him trying t his problem and find that there a only two <br /> alternatives,to his <br /> rezone the property or direct him to move. <br /> The Planning Csred with the enf recommendation the <br /> gaff torezone and the Hearingr examine roved he so sill <br /> recommendations for a taur 0 parcel surrounding <br /> pr n greed thattherezone <br /> is notincompatible with he r ning area. <br /> Gary Doughty said they had looked at many options, trying to keep <br /> from <br /> making or. Webster leave: He asked that both concomitant <br /> be amended by adding In No.9 A.2 of mobsters and <br /> 1A agreements h2 of Hillis prior to the;'except the Planning Director m <br /> upon written request, grant an additional30 days o execute the <br /> agreement'. <br /> Reid Shockey of 2901 Hewitt, representing M Blake and Harmon <br /> of the propety adjacent t the lots proposed for <br /> rezoning, opposed the r He felt Mr.to <br /> operatlon'wea 1 <br /> definitely an illeal use end should be allowed. Se felt if Mr. <br /> Wetste[. a successful enough that he wanted to expand his shop,he <br /> o <br /> should move to the.properly alined.are eunderstood that the <br /> Planning Staff had been guested to work on the commercial zone <br /> policies and suggested this be delayed until the Planning Commission <br /> has come up with recommended uses in the commercial Land Use Policy. <br /> Councilman Stephenson fele that 7th Ave. ould eventually be widened <br /> and this would impact Hr.Webster as he would lose some property. <br /> ncilman.o stree s <br /> said there se[ eral of this same kind of ';I <br /> problem on Evergreen Way and had they ever been solved. '�:, <br /> e[icksun 0eplted any w ted but sons were net <br /> salon until the buaina eh halm<losn or vovnc <br /> Webster said this blinding had be n constructed about 10 years <br /> ago by Robinson Plumbing and that behad leased it for six years <br /> then purchased it. He thougt it was. legal until 1983 when he <br /> applied for a permit to add on to the building. • <br /> Councilman Stephenson asked what he would do if he didn't receive BT <br /> the permit and he replied he would have to move. <br /> Councilman Overstreet aakn about parking a d Hr mougohty said he )0 • <br /> had a rough a a £o[ parking, but If he didn't Ce uld not be 55 <br /> allowed to expand. 38 <br /> 31 <br /> Mx <br /> r. Blake objected to the [e ne a he felt 1t would reduce the 75 <br /> value of his property. All of the area on Everett Mall H s being. ]0 <br /> developed ino taila developments and the c- zone would l0 <br /> s <br /> downgrade the area. He Pelt it was very important to protect the <br /> 31 <br /> C-1 zoneand sand he bad no objections to Mr.Webster expanding but 30 <br /> he did not want he zone changed. <br />