Laserfiche WebLink
518 December 10,1986 <br />• <br /> Bzhibit 1. staff report public hearing <br /> Proposedordinance <br /> Vicinity Map <br /> Preliminary Assessment Plat Mae <br /> Roll <br /> Letter <br /> ,Blair B.Be Special Cou a H1 <br /> L t from Blair sBurroughs,tion MethodvsPetition <br /> metmethod of forming a ution of Le <br /> Amortisation Charts-11.and88 <br /> Exhibit 1 solution of Intention <br /> Exhibit 3 tice f Hearing <br /> Exhibit 4 Preliminary Assessment Roll <br /> Exhibit 5Evergreen ayyaStudy <br /> en <br /> Exhibit 6 Three flow pe <br /> his <br /> prop Corbooek.Ever een steed that M1VW,has <br /> Kleincurbs ansa e°City Bank <br /> ank <br /> location Evergreen Nay mens[Sidewalks, everygutters sand <br /> coni for a improvements, o[ f his <br /> has feels vet a has ,was not <br /> t#in.favoto$4r <br /> backfor <br /> improvements nts when <br /> sthe taorited <br /> al lrequiredt heewemake s the imp hi.es mertP ar Daae rave <br /> ked he property neve should id 5 [a <br /> investmenttin M1eir heir 8 property and they will release a good f <br /> return on <br /> t. <br /> President Gipson nthen asked thatthe following writtenletters be <br /> read intthe record eked if there x any more <br /> re written <br /> yl� protests to be filed withtheCity Clerk d no one[plied. <br /> A letter from Everett II Associates (parcel, 3 8 51 stated they <br /> supported the street improvement Proposed and <br /> hthe 3CityOne[egerding <br /> formation of the LID but expressed concern. <br /> and 5 Iect ding the loss <br /> the loss of parking. They also expressed concern and regarding <br /> the <br /> • <br /> of traction during the g the summery toess lessen delays and mud <br /> construction be done during t <br /> problems. <br /> ��- A letter from the South Everett <br /> Association was introduced and <br /> g g <br /> l 1 <br /> stated that the G al Membership voted unanimously to authorise <br /> Phe v nuance - implementation of the Evergreen waySignage <br /> Project. <br /> t <br /> Aletter from F.A.S. Iv <br /> Investments (parcel, 1] s 18) was read and <br /> expressed objections to the inequities of the proposal it that <br /> properties which also benefit from the improvements are not included <br /> in the LID area. <br /> or. William Lucas. P.A.B. partner,[stated <br /> that he long in favor of <br /> the street improvements n were endue but <br /> protested to the <br /> saeeam Sea of the special,benefit determinations <br /> nd preliminary a g encs. <br /> A letter of proteststating <br /> a received from Lloyd <br /> enc Anderson and long e[. <br /> lJune ease(andethe a LID swould gcreate arfinanci 1 hardship ed them. gyet <br /> Lloyd Anderson stated that he objected t the LID nit would <br /> mcreate <br /> e <br /> a hardship in regard to their property.o There i a long ter <br /> which has seven or eight years left. <br /> • <br /> I'. <br /> • <br />