Laserfiche WebLink
1 *HI <br /> 11 IP <br /> January 14,1987 <br /> 141 <br /> conditions and it should have been a proper subject o4 j1 <br /> Diking c the o <br /> addiionalnegotiations pwitheople <br /> the union. He said apparatus contract as the l department t <br /> is spread people and no ill be additional eppaxa <br /> is spread thinner,there will be less service[o ane acituen s. 'N,1 <br /> He said it will increase the call load an the Everett firefighters <br /> but will add nothing to the work load of District ll. By the terms <br /> of this t <br /> District lir will the rdone and canhen the return[to tther station, so their I fid'' <br /> work load is reduced. He said the long distances they must run at <br /> high speed increases the risk to the firefighof ters.buildings city the thus �4 y, <br /> department does training andinspectionsannexed the it this I <br /> contract states that as these areas are <br /> ili <br /> receives comensatiresponsible <br /> n a for respresponding ding in thelcity but <br /> t the 1cityctill a <br /> receive no compensation this <br /> fort as the 1[y dealingdistrict's tM1'snothet entity <br /> toe union i sees protection <br /> boundaries h <br /> bargains for hire contract <br /> he city <br /> the b axlesa o the entity <br /> Hittaid inn does not exetlonan He yare saitl there at this,but�yt areas <br /> be dins <br /> contract end tithe union can't comfortably a accept this. <br /> He pointed <br /> t that the boundaries where the city and r <br /> respond ere not specified at ell. They also object to the length of <br /> tssgxeemen and the wording the two <br /> chiefsdecide <br /> w <br /> here <br /> station closed moved. <br /> •vTheyalsoPelt the <br /> ax g ph on supervision was unacceptable <br /> nion contract <br /> i4 there w anything Ln <br /> herr u <br /> eretl ecvtl they coulde dnegotlete this contract and Mr. Demon reDlled <br /> n <br /> Where was not. <br /> actually needed a contract <br /> s the cit y^ <br /> Councilman Stephan shed it need an agreement but the union <br /> and Mr.gammon replied the y may n <br /> should be involved in the articles o4 the agreement. <br /> Councilman Overstreet asked how this agreement affected their o <br /> working conditions and he replied because 4 the length of response <br /> time and having to deal with who is in charge. <br /> Vaugwith then Fite Administrationbut when the i <br /> Local <br /> JSesunion theyhad <br /> did not discussions <br /> siitM1 <br /> their plans they were excused. H said there had been a some talk <br /> that the city firemen would be training the District 11 people but . s <br /> there is nothing in the contract about it. <br /> Councilman Stephenson asked why this contract hadn't been handled ' <br /> through a grievance process and Mr.Angelreplied under the contract <br /> a grievance can De used only when St applies to one individual. <br /> Councilman Stephenson then said the city has pursued an annexation jff i t <br /> policy^and has <br /> identified the city's sphere of influence as 132nd uPlic j <br /> safety.E Wwith that tith that thlj <br /> e council lM1 sa tathe look sat.this contr ct afor nd say ' <br /> is it fair,is it reasonable. He said they didn't want the firemen 4 Y <br /> to be unsafe either with the long runs,but the council <br /> kinyF.+.,� <br /> far an agreement that was Pair, that was equitableantl that wag f <br /> balanced. <br /> i <br /> Ili ' <br /> ihrRl' <br /> i <br />