My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1987/01/14 Council Minutes
>
Council Minutes
>
1987/01/14 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2020 11:41:33 AM
Creation date
9/29/2020 7:41:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Minutes
Date
1/14/1987
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
11 <br /> ,11 <br /> ill <br /> January 16,1981 IFI',. <br /> 3{{1111 <br /> asked if any c uncilmembee knows of any real or potential conflict t <br /> which should cause that member to avoid participation in the hearing <br /> and no one replied. He asked if any property owner or . <br /> representativewho objects for whatever reason o Ss participation d1 <br /> D y othercome/Member.e/Member. participation in the proceedings and Ur[� <br /> again, replied. <br /> He id the primary purpose o4 the heaping is for the council to ')�. <br /> adividu whether to farm this LID. As Popp oP Chet process i� <br /> individual property owners will the be given an explaining <br /> he reasons m( <br /> evidence and information to the City Council LxDlaining the <br /> easons <br /> they favor or object to the formation of his is is the the <br /> timeite <br /> co read and consider property nets'protests. This <br /> ns nst the nature led and a district. <br /> the project and the iboundaries of the mprovements asked r pts thak a e at <br /> be whatever or information is press ted be limited to that <br /> subject. <br /> An additional purpose of the hearingis to provide a question and <br /> answer session. however,Its purpose is not, to <br /> answer in detail or <br /> discuss at length questions about the amounts o4 estimated <br /> individual assessments. If the LID is formed, there will be <br /> future hearing dealing with specific amounts f final assessments.ents. <br /> Questions about the amounts of preliminary estimated assessments and <br /> the proposed improvements x111 be noted and may be responded to <br /> .g <br /> the hearing. <br /> later in 9 <br /> He then introduced Blair Burroughs, LID special counsel, who said <br /> this heaping is designated by statute and is not like other types of <br /> hearings. He explained the process o4 an LID and said there are <br /> several methods that can be used to assess the properties, but i <br /> his instance the city Pelt the special benefit method was the <br /> fairest as those citizens benefitted by the LID would be paying for <br /> it. <br /> Cella Strong of Public Works Department said the roposed LID,known <br /> s the 60th St. LID, is for the complete construction streetof a tenalonnew <br /> ew <br /> (unnamed) street celled 60th St. S.W., u <br /> a and water systems <br /> Hardeson Road between 60th and 75th St. and sewer <br /> serveto the area. The 60th St.LID boundariesare roughly defined <br /> as the Powder Will Gulch on the west, the south boundary of the <br /> existing developed, platted properties on the north, Glenwood Ave. <br /> and Upper Ridge Rd. on the east and about 75th St. on the a south.' <br /> The boundaries include all the properties that need to have all, or <br /> parts, <br /> ts, of heft and improvement before that property could be developed. <br /> beat use The water and sewer need to be <br /> necessarystems are utilities and n <br /> installed for most of the properties to <br /> partsreceive osservice. <br /> he SW street • <br /> Everett <br /> systems are integral, s para for the Comprehensive <br /> Comprehensive Plan. she said,in other Ards, <br /> Plan to work and allow the proper development of SW Everett,such es <br /> the oning designated on the properties, these,streets must be <br /> constructed. <br /> Several meetings over a two year priod have been held with property <br /> owners in the 60thSt. areato assist in determiningthe timing, <br /> location and scope of the improvements. The exception is the BoeingCo., laud and other I In, <br /> proposed LID. Including properties <br /> tproperty eewnrinto south extreme <br /> the project is <br /> 6 <br /> 166661:.,,1:., <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.