My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1987/02/18 Council Minutes
>
Council Minutes
>
1987/02/18 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2020 11:44:32 AM
Creation date
9/29/2020 7:43:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Minutes
Date
2/18/1987
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
74 February 18,1987 <br /> He asked iPy,.property owner or representative who objected for <br /> reasonever tohis any other c uncilmembers participation in <br /> thetproceedl g W o response was heard. <br /> President Gipson stated the primary purpos L of the hearing is for <br /> council to consider whether o form thio LID. x111 s a part <br /> tbe gtof tan <br /> he <br /> rocess all individual property owners x to <br /> opportunity to epresent evidence and information the Council <br /> explaining the reasons they favor o object to the formation of the <br /> LID. <br /> President Gipson said this is the time to onstder the nature oP the <br /> project antl the improvementp Chet ere tm PeOeClnst elletl and the <br /> tountlaries mP the tistxict. n ar session Pu Its purpose in not to <br />• <br /> to provide a question and answer Bess mp no <br /> answer <br /> in detail o[discuss questions bout the amounts <br /> 111 estimated <br /> future hearing <br /> assessments. IP the LID m u s off. a <br /> Pu[ure he ertng dealing with specific amounts of Pinel assessments. <br /> BleSx Burroughs of Hills end CPgden, counsel,p�stated that this R <br /> hearing was to consider st rest mtxoveent..% nnametl street 31^ <br /> celled 16th Pxam 312th sLxeet na th to 102nd street, including <br /> improvements on lo2nd antl lost LM1odHe tZ einedbe a setl::sasfe°s the <br />• <br /> • ' dna aaie Ceara age adv me =°n <br /> properttes�.but in this instance the it Pelt the special benefit <br /> method was the Peirest those as wens tedPiby h the LID would <br /> be payig Por S[. This LID was initiated by the Cite by the <br /> resolution cethotl, antler this methotl, all protests ting 60Y iP <br /> writing to be considedetl. IP pxoDe[ty Dunes° x g:s1 n <br /> the co t oP the Local Imbf them District bashes L nt file a written <br /> City Ss div ested3 of tlits authority to proceed. <br /> tion of the, S0-oxtlinanee. the <br /> Celia Strong,LID Administrator, stated the formation of hLIDo <br /> me. the Street improvements follows the hPlanning Commission's <br /> recommendation LID <br /> the proper development of the area. area are <br /> The of the south end properties or the proposed LID e <br /> opposing the L D and have offered an escrow agreement end a Waixent <br /> Deed P r right-oP-way to insure their completion of the road o the <br /> o <br /> City's specification if their property is removed from consideration <br /> in he c D. If this is acceptable. then it would be necessary <br /> start the LID process ell over again. sodas <br /> Hs. Strong stated that the preliminary assessments were <br /> calculated <br /> on the a method. The se and LID hearing is for the purpose of <br /> taking testimony onassessments. If the ID is formed a Special <br /> Benefit study woad performed. <br /> P letter of protest from the WashingtonStats.Dep t ant of <br /> p <br /> Transportation, owner f parch B was deBe <br /> stated ta State is opposed t the formation Department P nsportetton <br /> P t isLID, <br /> he <br /> b protest letting Prom D e h of to°trap=°ended Por Pgrowth It'tis <br /> 39 4 40,stating tM1e area as rea ° <br /> time. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.