Laserfiche WebLink
151 April 15,1987 <br /> Mrb <br /> lies..;rtthpCrioty'sm leat ile y timltbroegdhtSto heyhe <br /> attention. dtt0 <br /> N <br /> Ed Hansen, Attorney for Cary Anderson, stated in 1985 a letter was <br /> I,.. sent to Mx. BOurland's counsel stating that.Mr. Anderson would <br /> cooperate in mitigating these conditions cost <br /> dedicating the right or <br /> o <br /> way to the City as long as it did not c st him anything, did not <br /> adversely affect his parking or damage his landscaping. <br /> Councilmen Stephenson asked about the Common teleoding the Ploys <br /> ownership pP same of the property in questton.t <br /> Mr.Lantlles stated that the City owned 3 to 4 feet of the property <br /> in question end the requitement of having the developer ke the <br /> offsite as n <br /> well as the o site improvements aro consistent with <br /> conditionimposed on other developments. <br /> Councilman Overstreet stated there seem to be some..conflict as so <br /> the traffic count on Third Avenue. The figures from the Planning <br /> Department state ftraffic counts show that 500 vehicles per week day <br /> n Third Avenue, the proposal would result In an additional 300 to <br /> 400 per day". These figures a significantly more than 100 Mx. <br /> Bastian previously stated. <br /> Lantlles stated that the figures tM1et a usetl In the Planning <br /> memo during report is a clvie quote Prom ethe TrePPtc Engineer's <br /> memo aurins the subdivision review. <br /> I/,. wr.easuan states ne <br /> csnePl3dCt%to iranohso thatttarflC rthereounwereA two dtrrerenb <br /> traffic reports wM1ich <br /> MOved by Councilmen Stephenson,seconded.by Councilmen wive to close <br /> the public nearing. <br /> President Gipson asked if anyone else wished to speak and n <br /> ied, o one <br /> Pope who was Roll was <br /> calleduewith all councilmen voting yes except Councilman <br /> I Motion Carried. <br /> APPEAL <br /> Moved by Councilman Niva,seconded by Councilman Len <br /> appeal y the Planning De a at he play the <br /> Department deny the BOurlanetasubdivision recommend that the Tanning <br /> safety Issues. request based an public <br /> Councilman Niva stated that if Council takes this actionit will <br /> alleviate the legal questions of the appropriateness or the Plannin <br /> Dprovement sartment as an The aggrievparty e d the requirement of off site <br /> imgal n questionshave Clouded the basic concern <br /> of the safety issues which are paramount in the approval of this <br /> subdivision. <br /> I <br />