Laserfiche WebLink
PY i 1" 282 <br /> ,1 + July 15,1987 <br /> Roll was called with all councilmen voting yes. <br /> t Motion carried. <br /> ..?qi PUBLIC HEARING-SOLIE REZONE <br /> President Gipson said this was a public hearing to consider <br /> concurring with the Planning <br /> Commission findings and disapprove a <br /> Everett <br /> requested amendment to the v re Comprehensive General Plan. <br /> 1 I Allen GLPPen o4 the Planning Department said Solis Builders, Inc. <br /> applied for an amendment to the Everett Comprehensive General Plan <br /> to change the designation of the property located on the southeast <br /> 4 ay and 75th St. 5 from Single Family Detached, 1 <br /> to 5 dwellings a per gross acre" to Commercial." A t <br /> Il l 11, application Prezone wasfiledto change the present R-1 to <br /> "C-1" ac(General Commercial) with contract to allow development of a <br />} contractor's office, shop and storage yard. The Planning Commission <br /> } held two public hearings Concerning the matter and on June 16, 1987 <br /> disapproved the request,based on the following findings: <br /> k$,, 1. The 1986 Residential Comprehensive Plan designated the <br /> property and neighborhood"Single Family Detached, 1 c dwellings <br /> 9k i 11',18',1 <br /> since the <br /> adoptioner s of said plans acre" d hick rantcircumstancea change in lands have tschanged <br /> ddesignation. <br /> g I' 11',j' 2. The proposed action would extend commercial land use across a <br /> i substantial man made barrier which provides a logical s transition <br />• �� that mtnimiaas the impact o4 Commercial uses to the south upon the <br /> $'} residential neighborhood to the north. <br /> �?y�' 3. The proposed change to land use designation would be contrary <br /> 'fb P to existing comprehensive plan policies concerning the protection of <br /> g Y residential neighborhoods. <br /> it A. The proposed change is not Consistent with the locational <br /> iI fol criteria af the proposed commercial land use policies P the Everett <br /> I9J Comprehensive General Plan. <br /> Y Mr. GSPPen said at the July 1st meeting when thrs tee rng was <br /> Ci V continued, council had ra ue at tl information concerning traffic on <br /> y5 75th and Broadway. The TrafficEngineering Department has stated <br /> :ill, <br /> ' that present traffic Counts do not warrant a traffic signal at this <br /> 1 intersection. The buildout potential in the valley view <br /> neighborhood is 50 to 60 additional single family dwellings which <br /> �` would generate approximately 500 to 600 additional vehicle trips per <br /> p day. This amount of added traffic would push 75th St. to capacity <br /> A { and warrant a traffic signal at this intersection. <br /> 111 Ill 1 Councilman Overstreet asked if there was anyt other C-1 or C 2 <br /> property available for this type a4 u wa hcut rezoning other <br /> 1 property and Mr. GSfPen replied the amount of C-1 zone property <br /> undeveloped in the city would not be'consumed until theend of the <br /> M I century. <br /> I [II " Councilman Stephenson said an advice of counsel h wanted t0 state <br /> he lived approximately six blocks from this area on Heather Way. He <br /> said it is his desire, and cauns 1eurs that he can participate <br /> n this issue and that his decision would be based on the material <br /> presented and testimony heard. <br /> Ft. Y <br /> k. I <br />