My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1987/07/29 Council Minutes
>
Council Minutes
>
1987/07/29 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2020 11:48:54 AM
Creation date
9/29/2020 7:50:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Minutes
Date
7/29/1987
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
13,;; 310 <br /> IJy <br /> ' <br /> .1°g July 29, 98] <br /> pumps can't be by-passed but they can be operated at a significantly <br /> reduced energy m consumption level at time when the PUD is at their <br /> most dire n d for energy or their residential customers. This <br /> ec <br /> sults in the pressure increasing in most portions s ofthe'No. 5 <br /> lineat this time and thecity Peels that PRV necessary on <br /> those <br /> services that are hooked up directly to the transmission line. <br /> He said many years ago, when the city built the transmission line <br /> Lake Chaplain'_o the city,many people said they would like to <br /> tapm Into the transmission line rather than dig a well and at that <br /> r'l it" time the commissioners adopted regulations pertaining to that typea <br /> 4 0 kk of service. They recognized It was not possible to operate a <br /> transmission line the same way you ca control tightly a <br /> (! f 1. distribution.system. - - <br /> 5 'II. The codes recognize this is first n lnterruptable supply, and <br /> second, a supply with fluctuating pressure that needs to be dealt <br /> with. Some places are Pine but some people already have PRVs as <br /> their pressure already is over uthe 100 psi. All these people have <br /> to sign farm stating they will provide storagebecause <br /> u e 1f the <br /> transmission line has to be repaired It is generally shut down from <br /> five to s a <br /> en days. These re all metered customers and the <br /> $ 35 majority are eervd by small water districts. The rates for these <br />, ,1 j1}1 : people are slightly lower than the meter rate charged inside the <br /> Vi{r city. <br /> II. l'.. He said the actual work Ill not start until themiddle of next <br /> ryy�� year,but they have peen doing some prapata y by hanging aa <br /> A� i slues antl locating all the services. me <br /> g{E Councilman Kiva asked what the rate was P thesepeople and Mr. <br /> i Olivers said the citrate was higher but with this increase the two <br /> ' l� will be about the same. In about two ye the city rate will <br /> 7 <br /> again be higher. <br /> Ij,1', Councilman Kiva said then the city is o!! Sn9 o put In the'UV' <br /> check it,see that it works right, operate it etc. for this fee o <br /> they can do tM1eir own antl be responsible Pox It. <br /> I A letter was read from Jean C.Grieve of 5522 69th Ave.S.E.asking <br /> I( COhat voting on this proposed ordinance be el Tddi-until "'Par"' <br /> wners have received specific inloxmat ion an the o tlinence. <br /> Debra Bickford of]12]Skipley Road said she wa representing the <br /> neighborhood on <br /> Poises Hill and presented a petition with 59 <br /> 1 ,.. signatures opposing the charge of$6.25 because of the installation <br /> of PRVs. She said they had not been Informed about the project and <br /> requested continuation until she could get a list of the water users <br /> so they could have a meeting. <br /> 1 Bob Kelly of 7621 52nd Or. S.E. objected to paying the Increased <br /> rate. <br />$ I tl1 <br /> 0052:10009 6825 Skipley saitl tM1e city Das already installed a PRV <br /> at this home and he objected to paying. <br /> li Denise Beneker of 8015 Skipley was concerned about the safety of the <br /> PRVs. <br /> lill:i <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.