1987/10/28 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

431 October 28,1987 jr 24. The final site plan be consistent with the site plan displayed and described to Council at this hearing which includes 25 foot setbacks on the north and south boundary lines and a 15 foot setback on the east boundary line. 25. Fencing,berming and dense evergreen buffer around the North, South and seat boundary of the site except in those areas where the preservation of existing tree cover and wetland protection dictates that au.a buffer not be provided and those areas where it is not provided will be at the determination of the City staff. Otherwise it will be provided along the entire north,south and east boundary. 26. Save as much of the natural vegetation as possible on the site eepecially respecting the evergreen tree cover and will 1 defer to staff as to which of those vegetation areas need to be preserved. 27. provide ,mtland enhancement to diversify and increase the habitat value as allowed by the resource agencies with 1! jurisdiction over such wetland areas. 28. Provide and record a covenant Co the property guaranteeing maintenance of oil and water separators with provisiona for the right of City enforcement of those binding on the owner, Metco,and all future heirs,successors and asaigns. 29. Zr=d860tPaffg:::=Pfrejr:t:IrleCOL:=171:Int= the benefit of an LID. 30. ReCiard a L.I.D.or E.T.D.non-protest agreement binding Eetco and all future owners,successors and assigns to not protest the formation of any local improvement district for the improvements to 19th Avenue SE elect forth in the staff recommendation. 31. Provide written certification from the Corps of Engineers that no permit is required under the 404 regulation before building permit issuance provided that the Corps does not require that permit for any enhancement program approved by any other resource agencies. Roll was called on the amendment with all councilmembers voting yes except Councilmember Gipson who was excused. • notion carried. Vice President Morrow asked aim Iles,Assistant City Attorney, to review the legal possibilities. Mr. Iles stated that with the zoning on the site,the testimony tonight and the willingness of the devloper to mitigate any conceit would aPPeer from a leg. stanedpoint that the alternatirn.,ves available to Council are either to confirm the Determination of Non-Significance or make additional findings and based on those findings revise the DES.