Laserfiche WebLink
December 16,1987 535 <br /> The City Clerk then read the following protests: <br /> Anthony NE Quintana,Village Pancake House,Parcel 49. <br /> Clarence E.6 Su A.Closser,Parcel 37. <br /> J.E.Anderegg,Mutual Materials Co reel 27. <br /> John C.L. <br /> ugh,Public Storage In.ce Parcel 175. <br /> C.N. <br /> Richard L.Smith,Paper Picup,Parcel 34. <br /> C.N.Sorgen,312 Marilyn,Parcel 30. <br /> Jerry L.and Pamela DeYoung,9326 evergreen Nay,Parcel 10A a B. <br /> Charles Gilkey,G.A.Building Fund, reel 12. <br /> C. J. Ebert, representing owners of S.E.•corner of McGill and <br /> Ever <br /> AthenaeS.�Doolittle,Parcel 25A <br /> David Spiers oP 1130 90th S.N, said he w ars raiser entl had <br /> reviewed the property entl Pelt the speclal Oene4 ft wa toe M1lgh. <br /> Arthur Armstrong a4 3001 51st P1. S.M., o of Parcel 12 also <br /> Pelt the assess nts were too high. owner er <br /> Mike Rodgers, representing Athena Doolittle objected to the due <br /> process 0P this hearing. Ha aid he had anappraiser here to <br /> testify about lM1e speclal benePlt chargee. <br /> President Gipson said because the city ordinance states that all <br /> e: <br /> !%0;4tnahljoudsbtr9tupr,nmtohethmethng o <br /> net morning. <br /> He then recessed the meeting until 8:30 a.m.December 17,1987. <br /> The <br /> Council meeting <br /> reconvened <br /> Everett Cityy Hall, Pres mbar 17, 1987 to the <br /> Nayox Noose and all uncMa eexvuse Sint attendanGipson ce <br /> Councilmember Overstreet cwho d were kc pt <br /> Mfikae eHguntsteneto PM1e hea ae saeoeeno llwr oP D rn efollowing grounds: <br /> 1. Te City thapracptoesded aebsitarsasriat and a caPncmaly lldwros <br /> basis. <br /> benefits Pxom moble project axe general benefits to the entire <br /> City. <br /> 3. The proposed assessments are substantially higher than <br /> an <br /> value <br /> specialbenefit which actually increases the fair market <br /> e ofowner's remaining property. <br /> A. The combination of all of the owner's property for the <br /> assessment of the special benefit. <br /> The Clty has used an illegal end incorrect appraisal unit he <br /> assessing speclal benefits. <br />