Laserfiche WebLink
II <br /> 05 11 I <br /> March 2,1988 tf {�r <br />} Nr.GSffen stated that as part of the implementation process lot the fl `^t' <br /> Everett General Plan,the priority zoning code amendments seek to )I <br /> xry outgoals, objectives and policies of the General Plan by it <br /> preserving multiple family zoned ares for residential development, illi <br /> encouraging clinics and professioCO nal.offices into the designated fff <br /> [eas for such activities or to he cora and to direct other t <br /> non-residential uses into downtown or commercial zones <br /> Additional housing measures will b x amined in the overall Zoning 141 <br /> Code Code revision process such as accessory dwelling units <br /> (mother -in-law apartments) in Ingle examined <br /> dwellings, smaller lot �i" <br /> sizes for single family dwellings or duplexes, density bonuses in 1�'Ap� <br /> multiple family zones and new zone districts ler single family 1 Cy,:F'I <br /> attached dwellings one <br /> H reviewed lettere oP concern regaxdaing spec T Lasues oP the <br /> epital,s Prem the Eof America <br /> School r Saylt No. he Providence ' <br /> F Hospital,Coachmen Inns of America end our Sevlox's Lutheran Church. <br /> f Mayor Naora stated M1e Pelt a mix oT u es is neo eery and:0=1: <br /> tlesixeble YF <br /> n CM1e neighbo[M1oode. He Pelt that south o4 ePaclfic sh0 be <br /> considered for commercial uses. <br /> Chuck Hose, of 2118 Pine, Vice President of the Planning <br /> Commtssion, he aSStl men Planning Commission process and recommended Ik 1' <br /> adoption o4 the amendments ea presented. <br /> John Van Dalen, of 1316 Hoyt, representing First Baptist Church, 1 <br /> commented on the effect on churches by the amendments and the need f t <br /> for additional parking in the downtown area. <br /> John Robinett,3402 Tulalip,stated the amendments are not conducive <br /> to meeting the future needs of the city. He stated a mix use trend <br /> is more adaptable to solving some o4 the downtown core problems. He <br /> Pelt the amendments eliminate competition. He felt the changes must <br /> be in concert with any concessions given to encourage development. <br /> Scott Brown, Snohomish County Camanc Island Board of Realtors, <br /> stated it was their position to support private property rights and <br /> that the proposed amendments infringed on this right. stated the �i 'I <br /> amendments will not solve the problems of the downtown area and that <br /> parking concessions and other concessions must be adopted in <br /> conjunction with the.[estrictive changes. 1 .I' <br /> Gretchen Shaffer, of 806 Alpine Drive, President of the Planning <br /> Commission, stated it was the intention of the amendments to <br /> stimulate the downtown area and the Commission is looking for i <br /> direction from the Council,ee ire <br /> Marc 1 <br /> Intend, of LynnwooJJ, stated he Pelt the professional office <br /> designation a too restrictive and wondered who would be di ^( I <br /> responsible for policing this part of the amendments. 1 t, <br /> Viola ouxsler, 551 Pilchuck Path, stated the sooner the amendments Ik, <br /> Care <br /> ode.adopted the better. The City needs an up-to-date modern zoning <br /> ItE1 <br /> risk <br /> 1ST F'�I <br />