Laserfiche WebLink
230 <br /> June 15,1988 <br /> trI7DN',71171rXeg:;::g1erf:In1':hiT"'n°lia"""'''''""P" <br /> RESOLUT/1114-SPU APPEAL <br /> President Niva said the purpose of scheduling this meeting was to <br /> hear the appeal by three property owners of the Hearing Examiner's <br /> decision to approve a Special Use Permit and Variance for expansion <br /> 1 of the Everett General Hedical Center. <br /> l' i1'.. The decision council will be asked to make is whether or not the <br /> Hearing Examiner used an erroneous procedure or that there was <br /> substantial error-of-fact or error-in-law. If it is determined that <br /> error did exist, council can do one of two things 1, remand the <br /> 1111 i matter to the Hearing Examiner or 2, schedule a public hearing. <br /> Otherwise t,e council must deny the appeal. <br />; ,15 She said this Is not the time for a complete rehearing of the merits <br /> or liabilities cf. the project. Because of the strong feeling on <br /> 1 , <br /> )11 1,1 both sides of this issue,there would be a procedure followed <br /> First, the staff would be introduced for a brief presentation. The <br /> council has had an opportunity to review tapes of the proceedings. <br /> letters pro and con and site plans. Next there would be five <br /> minutes by each of the three appellants to establish why they <br /> believe an error has occurred as submitted in their written <br /> statements. Next the General Hospital Representative. <br /> 1 11 <br /> She said although the meeting is only to address the issues raised <br /> 4 , by the appellants, if other In the audience wish to comment on the <br /> appeal issues,please keep the comments to the points the appellants <br /> have raised, nos new 1.5.0. Finally the council will discuss and <br /> make their decision. <br /> President Niva said she was concerned that this meeting ha fair in, 1 form end substance as well as aPPeerence eo she 1,5.d the <br /> councilmembers If they could do this. <br /> , Councilmember Gipson said he wanted everyone present to know that he <br /> 11 was a former member of the General Hospital Board but he felt he <br /> could hear this ln a fair and objective manner. <br /> Councilmember Overstreet said he had Just learned that his daughter <br /> and son-in-law had testified before the Hearing Examiner but he also <br /> felt he could hear this in a fair and ojbective manner. <br /> 1.11 g:;:121rP141n:tteringTnno:n:gie! "e" c""me""' <br /> '' 1 Gary Doughty of the Planning Department said Jack Plnette, Pauline <br /> k , Kerney and William Odell assert that hby the <br /> Hearing Examinethey are eaceggsieved <br /> r's decision of May 18, 1988 denying their requests <br /> to reconsideration of his earlier decision on April 27, 1988. The <br /> April 27th decision approve a Special Property Use Permit and <br /> , Variance for General Hospital Medical Center to build a 6 1/2 story <br /> medical office building and a 4 1/2 story parking garage. The <br /> appellants contend that errors-in-fact and errors-In-law exist in <br /> i the Hearing Examiner's record. The appellants request that City <br /> Council reverse or modify the Hearimg Examiner's decision on Special <br /> I Property Use Permit 63-88 and Variance 13-88. <br /> 1' <br /> b , <br /> I I:1 <br />