1988/06/15 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

4x 232 •' 4 June 15,1908 µµµt Jack PSnnette of 1402 Hoyt safe there has been no research done o A located O consideration given to the commerical area 2 1/2 blocks to the east o4 the hospital for these improvements. No research o I'_ Y„ testimony was given to the home owners in regards to the loss o4 value for the increase in traffic ancongestion.ngestian. There has been no research or testimony given to the home owners inthe area F for their loss of value for view obstruction t shade areas that these buildings will impact. Pauline Kerney of 1333 Rockefeller sold she opposed widening 14th Street because St will cause decreased visibility at the c and k bring the street and power lines closer to the hones corners hazardous conditions. red Cattle,attorney representing General Hospital, said Mr. O'Dell nada the statement that eGeneral Hospital had not been a good 4; 7, neighbor but had threatened the citizens. He said the hospital had q none through a number of changes in the facility to make it into the 1 F ! medical k it is today and the atestimonyfrom the neighborhood \ 111 that theneighborhood had been stable and quiet neighborhood. /t Hess said It Inconsistent roar this major.institution that hes /� been s L midst R ofthis could be such a negative impact that three th M1 ne said Mx. 0'Oe 11 had not hewn any 04 Pact o P 1 use that he dlsagiaetl with the { Hearing Examiners decisions.rH said nacccording to the ordinance the Yll burden of identifying or is upon or more of the appellants and if the council finds ran identifiable error, hen a hearing K fi ��0 should be set on this. Y i ao Pacillty r ncethisdecision.type can not e const xucee0 fn en 1- zo n YI r extreme a thorough antl the Heaxing Examiner M1etl came out with a �j extreoflt thoroughnThe council l already decided o IP IIS me of these decisions with the comprehensivealend plan. yJ The hospital has provided a perking Stud, a sterno study.end N I y ,1 shade study when asked and has identified every possible impact to i�HHH333 p the neighborhood at the request of the city. All the neighbors were � 'rQ. asked to be part of this. He said because of this the Hearing fII1 Examiner's function has been',Milled. He said Mr.O'Dell had not identified any error-in-fact or error-in-law, he just disagreed with the Hearing Examiner's decisions made on the testimony he had K 4 heard. He said this was true with Mx.Pxnnette and Mrs.Kerney also. 3 "' Councilmember Morrow asked if the hospital had done anything about the resident's property values and Mr.Cattle said they had not done dl 1;I this as the city had not asked them to do this. , Counollmenbex Stephenson asked about the point Mr. O'Dell had made that the parking garage was s u posed a to b 0 ft. high but In reality w s 40 Ti. a Allen Eimpo, Assoc Administrator of the hospital said the face of the garage is 30 ft. on Rockefelle.:and farther beck from the front of the building these is another level o provide more At that point the height Is 48 ft. above Rockefeller but lessor distance above the rade at that point a les. n Looking up at a angle to the building, you building, would not see that back I; face,you would only see the front o4 he building. EY It' Coeeember Overstreet asked the Traffic Engineer about the comment ent onexcessive traffic accidents on Rockefeller and 14th Si. and Mr. Davis said there had been one fatality two years ago at this t ,l