1988/07/20 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

2)) July 20,1996 suggestss ultimate improvement five lanes and interim improvementof three lanes in this vicinity which is in place at the pn resent. S said he was not aestablished of any policbeing i ut they are looking at a LIDn the Silver Lake areawith the developers bearing the cast of it. Councilmember Stephensonasked if this traffic impact policycould be discussed as an agenda item so something couldbe done. President Niva was concerned about condition 19 which states a groundwater recharge system with grit removal shell be provided,o a grass lined Swale in series with an oil/water separator shall sb i installed an the on-site storm drainage system. he wanted some k P assurance that the city was going to use biological methods to make sure the city doesn't have to depend on other people cleaning the 1 SI, system. j5 Thomas Lux of 2225 116th S.E.E representing the Silver Lake ActionCommit1I 1I points. He saidthe reviewed viewedi the items sin hadneglected appeal ereegarding important p'�1h 111 impacts,the magnitude of the concern of.the tate opt.of Ecology 4 I @; regarding the.wetlands and the Silver Lake Study by the City T , I Everett and the University of Washington was n of completed pilar to F Mr Driscoll's decision and has only recently become available and `,'! I was n not taken into consideration. This new data will affect Silver C Lake. He said the 29 conditions placed on the development were very standard. He said if the appeal is denied he asked for six additional editions to be placed on the development. He said denying this permit or significantly [educing density would reduce the negative impacts of traffic, lake pollution and natural aesthetics that are the goals of the Snohoalsh County Shoreline Master Program. Dorothy Vandeventer of 2012 129th Pl. S.E. said it was her , MHO contention that the developmentLakes Landing, as proposed is 1' h inepproprietegiven the site sensitive nature of its location on the shoreline of Silver Lake because of water quality. Pollution of Silver Lake.by urban runoff from impervious surfaces. Too high density and covenants ants to maintain wetlands and iP'.. detention facilities. The city has no drainage plan fax this area and the traffic effect of cumulative developments on S952>. }} John Phillips, representing the Mueller Construction Development $ Co., requested the council to deny the appeal and approve the Shoreline Permit as issued by the Hearing Examiner and recommended by Staff. He said he believed the record wasclear after tworey full harings with expert t testimony a d substantial evidence presented which the Hearing amine[ considered and adopted. He diE net believe there s an o[in the procedures or -in law. The Project is r in wa full x compliance with a city a zoning d the comprehensive plan,the master shoreline plan andthe countyecodes. He said the my reason this hearing is held tonight is that a ahorline permitsnecessary because there Is a shoreline 200 ft. in from the shore on this property and there will be one e building e and a of another building a that property. If itwasn't for -'I that,corner development could be constructed following the usual building permits,etc.