Laserfiche WebLink
00 <br /> ry'l£vi August 3,1988 <br /> Jl COUNCIL BILL ND.888-86 <br /> r £{ <br /> FIRST READING: <br /> 1 1AN ORDINANCE providing for the vacation of 00x01000 of <br /> Everett:Nall-Way. <br /> PUBLIC HEARING-SEPA APPEAL <br /> � President Siva opened the public hearing on the SEPA appeal stating <br /> thestaff would k presentation first,then a representative 0 <br /> 3 th p lent would peak and finally.a representative of the <br /> 1 developer. <br /> A Mary Cunningham of the Planning Department said on April 15, 1988, <br /> the city received an application from Greg -Pacific Design <br /> i I )){). Assoc. far aSEPA environmental review t0 construct convenience <br /> stare and gas station(Circle K)at the northeast corner of 41st and <br /> f { Colby. After review <br /> of an <br /> environmental checklist and public <br /> 9o' m nts,a FinalDetermination of Non-Significance(ONS)was issued <br /> II g on June 15,1900. An appeal of the DNS was submitted by Dead Cattle <br /> on behalf of We Development Co. Inc. J , 1988. The <br /> ( + issue appealed is h 1 tive traffic imps f proposal. <br /> { She said staff recommends the council uphold the Responsible <br /> Official's decisiont e <br /> u Determination <br /> nSig P1 e <br /> with the required mitigation measures as set forth P theproposed <br /> Circle K development. <br /> ( (! Brad Cattle, representing Weaver Development, said thetive <br /> traffic impact is not a valid issue, but a pending issue He"said <br /> !I y:: the cumulative traffic impact issues raised ^William Brost n he <br /> 4111'1£4Me Development apply equally thei t Mr. <br /> Brostappealedand the SuperiorCourt Judge id thecity h acted <br /> 1,1 <br /> � px p ly i approving the development. Thefinal memorandumt <br /> 4{ be issued thi se end there 1 p 1 11 ty thedecision ill be <br /> }((} <br /> appealed 0 H said thisP Non-Significance <br /> g sh ld b t d until there 1 1 l adV tl 1 th 1 ins <br /> oP Willi st with respect t t Wea 0 pment P j t, <br /> g which claims have equal applicability to this p j tIl�h CGuncilmember Stephenson asked if he believed his project would fall <br /> L ' behind the Circe development because of thecourt s and r. <br /> I' Cattle said no, but b of this case, it could interfere with <br /> III Circle K's project in the future. <br /> CDunCllmembex Dv t t ked her long the pp al period pull be <br /> f G !I'�.� and Mr Cattle saitl It could go as high as 60 tlays. <br />' t I{! . Cattle asked that the findingsbeamended following the Cause <br /> l� I No. in the NOTE by adding thed "which identifies possible <br /> significant, cumulative trafficimpact t the intersection 0P 61st <br /> I' and Colby resulting from known development in the vicinity of that <br /> intersection". He felt this would make the findings more detailed. <br /> yB Greg Brants representing Pacific Design Assoc., developer of the <br /> "'" III Circle K aid.he wanted the council to sknow that <br /> rehei had good <br /> ' rosiness relations <br /> with <br /> n Mr. Cattle <br /> eeavand <br /> he wanted to n neutral <br />'e, any pro Bros an <br /> t11 I <br />)91ke �1 '1;. <br />