1988/08/10 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

309 August 10.1988 weved by councilmember Pope, seconded by Councilmen:der Gipson,that this is declared to be the final reading of Council Bill No.E87-83 and the City Clerk ia directed to call the roll for the final disposition of the ordinance. AYES: lava,Stephenson,Gipson,Morro,Pope,Overstreet NAYS: None EXCUSED: Langus Ordinance No.1513-8B adopted. PUBLIC HEARING-LAKE'S LANDING president Siva opened the public hearing by stating the purpose is to consider an appeal of the Bearing Examiner's decision on Shoreline Permit OMA 414-87)to allow a 224 unit 8022080 0980128 called Lake's Landing. Gerry Ervine, Planning Staff, stated the Silver Lake Action eom.,tte. and Dorothy yandeventer are apyrieSed bY the Mee.. EN:miner's Decision of May 24, 1988 which denied the motion for reconsideration of his earlier decision of May 2, 1988. The decision was to approve a Shoreline Substantial Development Perm. for Mueller Development Company for development of an apartment complex of 224 units on a 9.9 acre site in the Silver Lake area of the Cit, The aPpellants contend that an error-in-fact and . enor-in-law existe in the record of the Hearing Examiner's decision. The Applellants request that C.City Council reverse the Examiner's decision on thie propoeal. Key issues Of concern are ,t, traffic,non-point pollution and compatibility. .n mathias,Utilities,spoke on the drainage probleme and sole... for the proposed project. Me stated hydrology is not . eXact science and therefore proposed solutions cannot be guaranteed to be 1 fallsafe. He said that state of the art techniqUes are being ' proposed to insure the success of the project. ON:nonmember Stephenson asked if it would be possible to take 'nes of Silver Lake to insure the preservation of the rastenZal!"' • Ity. He seld he felt this was verY ImPortant.07oGIna, to the city and requested that the Budget Committee and the Otilitiee Divsion offer a prOposed budget for the testing P... for the 1989 City budget. lohn Phillips, representing the Mueller Development Company, stated they are willing to work further with the neighborhood. He stated they have mitigated the majority of the concerns with the neighbors directly adjoining the subject property and have also mitigated many .4 other concerns in the general area. He offered additional conoessio. in the area of landscaping, wetland retention. Street teprovements, maintenance of drainage system a. maintenance and Preservation of the wetland area. allrttre'co'mpSle'n"anideTiLlecfr=gangels"=1)rseaY'oi;n:Po: the wetlands area. 'r:'v7ew'nedle 'AVIterrafrcelgumdel"tteCc"i= , 4deguate roadways and access to and from the project. )I• )