Laserfiche WebLink
321 <br /> August 17,1988 : <br /> 1B. Bruce]one:, Cvty Attorney stated that the currant language Sn <br /> ta OVeS a [M1b botm oan page four is eoopeapth. It x c gninoot <br /> that have bean sued d that the 00 of the lawsuit is f <br /> yet final. It also s fi that we will 0eationi final Responsible lof <br /> e <br /> the lawsuit a significantthrnew t the and <br /> the 0.esponsBrad <br /> Official will take another look la the Circle K proposal. Brae <br /> Cattle's language is making he statement more S tolled, <br /> reopen <br /> end o automatic. The foes noot S theDNSallows us more <br /> EIS. It <br /> thj Circle N railer. IC does not look <br /> a <br /> The language <br /> just says we will come back and take a proposal. <br /> CONCLUSIONS at Lt� <br /> gunge woultl allow further mitigation of the pxapoeal. <br /> CONCLUSIONS <br /> 1. SEPA apppaap181s an appeal of the Determination of Non-Significance <br /> 2. The appellant nuat prove that the city err d in lasting the '1 <br /> oeterminatlon of Non-SSgnlflcance on this project.e <br /> 3. The city staff's interpretation of the SEPA rules and policies <br /> regarding analysis of cumulative traffic impacts has been upheld Sc <br /> City Counciland Judge Kerahner in his June 2, 1988 decision i.'. <br /> regarding the SEPA review of the Weaver shopping center proposa. <br /> TM1e city staff <br /> W11.24:SEPA rules and policies in the s -.1 <br /> manner in re Viewing Snpacts of the Circle K proposal.a e <br /> 5. The city's Traffic Engineer has reviewed the Circle K proposal <br /> and has stated that the conditions placed on the ors are adequate to i 9 <br /> mitigate the impacts of the proposal. <br /> 6. The language in the Note at the bottom of page four P the NIS <br /> p <br /> oeterninatlon of Nan-Significance is sufficient to Slow theity to <br /> analyze the Circle K proposal should the court ultimately f <br /> determine that the city did not sufficiently analyze the Cumulative <br /> traffic impacts of the Weaver development proposal. <br /> DECISION <br /> The Cite Council RMS the Responsible Official's decision to <br /> issue Determinof Non-Significance with the required <br /> mitigation measures pet Porth for the proposed gas station and <br /> convenience tarelocated at the northeast corner of 61st St. and <br /> Colby Ave, <br /> Roll was called with all Councllnembers voting yes except <br /> Councilmember Stephenson who was excused. <br /> Notion carried.' <br /> BIDS RECEIVED <br /> Three bids <br /> followse <br /> ceived for the Keach Park/Walter Hall Park <br /> rejects as C <br /> Wilder const.,Bellingham 2416,000 a ST <br /> Nest Company Const.,Maltby 503,168 a ST <br /> J.J.Welkin Const,Redmond 445,300 m ST <br /> Recommendation is to ew od the Old to the lowest and most responsive <br /> bltl tlei,Wiltlex Cans[ruction. <br /> d�'y <br />