Laserfiche WebLink
k, <br /> 364 <br /> `1. September 14,1988 <br /> I., 2. In the event that city determines to utilize the County <br /> solid waste disposal t osal facility Cathcart, or <br /> 6 j elewhere,as part f the execution ofthe City's Solid <br /> iWaste Management Comprehensive Plan, dispose/fees for <br /> ' City of Everett residents and haulers shall be <br /> reasonable and shall be no greater than disposal fees <br /> is i J <br /> County Charted by the c to non-city residents and <br /> non-city haulers. <br /> IM iii o <br /> 3. The Snohomish County coolid Waste Division agrees closure22 <br /> participate in thet of anyadditional <br /> t 6and/or clean-up activities o cons truction required <br /> p <br /> local, state or <br /> federal regulatory agencies t0 be done iF�4 at the closed City landfill at 36th Street in Everett. <br /> Based on fifty year history of solid waste handled <br /> y of <br /> that facility from Snohomish County outside the <br /> ( dd Everette the County's share of h future closure <br /> 't, and/orlean-up costs is agreed to be no less then 54 <br /> percent <br /> YI(17 4 e <br /> County antl Can will rme SddX modifications which which ill <br /> utilization . <br /> �( encourage <br /> environmentally sound sludge utilization <br /> qe <br /> within Snohomish ano y. Sludge utilization options <br /> 7 shall include but not be limited to agricultural and '._ <br /> i silviculture' utilization andreclamation of <br /> E� construction sites. In addition to utilization,County <br /> and City will develop guidelines for 3 d9 dial..., L <br /> '116' ISE Cathcart or other appropriate sludge di p 1 sites. <br /> vMen Miller, Construction Supervisor for the County Solid Waste <br /> Division and Project Manager for the Leachate Project said he would <br /> 44 <br /> ,v 15; like make a comment as to cost. To truck leachate is an <br /> expensivemperation. He said he pipeline is cost saving compared <br /> ( to hauling in a truck and is environmentally safer. <br /> z)(({ un ilmember Stephenson said some of the verbal information he had <br /> n`1� received from County Council was that the cost today was 8650,000 <br /> but that cost would e0 down with the pipe line to some 865.000 but <br /> y the memo from Mr. Wed said if the contract is not signed the cost <br /> 16 ltP <br /> will go up but if it is signed the Cost will remain the same. He <br /> ( ( asked him to explain this. <br /> Mx. Willer said the cat for transporting the leachate would <br /> �F certainly be a lot less with the pipeline. The construction Costs <br /> k6have t0 be amortized over about seven years,but the cost per gallon <br /> currently is one cent a gallon but in a pipeline it weuld be a <br /> ( ' fraction of a penny for pumping it. The City of Everett acilit <br /> hare <br /> &J-61 i manned ies <br /> about 2 1/4t per gallonat the dump station, a <br /> h" t� This cast that facilityandwould down the o ucharged es s because w industrialstrengthtree would no ngthe sewage <br /> according to the ordinance. The costs are going are use of the <br /> [ I city's industrial pre-treatment program, those surcharges the <br /> it <br /> county will pay and the county also sees the need for additional <br /> 1 pre-treatment programs to meet the city's standards. The County <br /> 111 continue to meet the city's standards so it will keep the cost <br /> y .,. up for the County so it is difficult to see that the overall cost <br /> i 1 6 will get any cheaoes per than it is todayntbnuesbut itowill <br /> truckslow <br /> thedown <br /> rate that ois <br /> will just continue t skyrocket p. If the ounty c C <br /> CI' co 0 <br /> 16 <br /> ```yyy`y``��1��1Y <br />