Laserfiche WebLink
413 <br /> October 12, f.. <br /> 1988 <br /> 89 He said the first oneu der Section A of the resolution clarifies a <br /> 06 little bit, the statusof lots existing in 1956 by add in s,'in <br /> 99 place of "is" so that itputs it in the past tense. This wa <br /> isin <br /> s 4 <br /> Paragraph of Section of the PlanningCommission's recommended <br /> ordinance. The second is an additional sentence to paragraph3 of <br /> 74 Section 4 of the recommended ordinance. This really amplifies the <br /> 1,1 <br /> ening of structure in the context of the merger clause. The <br /> purpose of adding this was so that the section that referred to <br /> merging by construction, it is understood what type of structures <br /> merge lots. <br /> u cilmember Morrow thought the council should watt until the total <br /> ening ordinance had been completed and brought to the council for <br /> appal,rather than voting on this now. <br /> Chuck Moser asked that the recommendation of the Planning Commission <br /> be approved. <br /> VS Ousiex of 551 PS1chuck Path said the majority of the north end of <br /> Everett has 25 foot lots and is zoned R2 which does not allow for <br /> appartments. She said afforable housing is not cheap to construct <br /> and asked that the merge clause be passed until the zoning ordinance <br /> is brought back. • <br /> Jahn Robinette, speaking for the Board of Realtors said two of the <br /> • <br /> seshorn Sn tse slides an 25 foot lots were built by his company <br /> oedbnsa purchasers were paying city a e nth poingtto said hat <br /> ordinances end process 07thill tae cl ty M1sp been fav Pox 30 years nos <br /> clause <br /> been declared illegal. he spoke in ommis P the merger <br /> He <br /> but out not in fav of the ivenhous Cg iiaslon setlif he <br /> co pointed out 5 the reason on expensive Housing is because of the 11 <br /> costs of the lata and the zoning regulations. .S{ <br /> Terry Slatten oP 4100 Se. Third spoke re <br /> fee" <br /> oP the Planning 11 <br /> Commission's ordinance. <br /> Scott Brawn, of the Board of Realtors, spoke in favor of their •. <br /> ordinance. <br /> Gretchen Shaffer of the PlanningCommission said the Planning <br /> a <br /> Commission w ,not against the ealtors but Pelt the Planning ' <br /> thisGommities. ordinance should be adopted as the best solution at <br /> ti <br /> Meted by Councilmember Stephenson,seconded by 0Oun000eseber Gipsc <br /> to adopt the Planning comnisaon Ordinance. n <br /> Councilmember Gipson spoke in favor of the ordinance. :11. <br /> councilmember Pope spoke against the ordinance and urged the council <br /> to vote no. <br /> Moved by councilmember Overstreet, seconded by Councilmember <br /> Stephenson to amend the Ordinance by replacing paragraph 1 of <br /> Section 4 with the following, "Any lot which does net meetthe <br /> minimum lot area or widthrequirements of the zone in which it is <br /> located, and which was conveyed and held as n separate lot in <br /> na s <br /> a <br /> separate ownership of the above dates and hes not been <br /> subsequently merr <br /> merged with contiguous lots in accordance with <br /> o <br /> Paragraph 2 or 3 P Section 4is a substandard lot."ac <br />