Laserfiche WebLink
252 <br /> 3ry�'c,t J ne 28,1989 <br /> y'-'Vu <br /> to the Mitigated Determination of Non-significance(MGN[.f3[-B9).Por. <br /> Berkley Warehouse, including he modifications o he MONS <br /> contained in the decision. u ex <br /> yy Roll as called with all co ncilmembers voting yes except <br /> s, MS, Councilmember Gipson who was excused. <br /> Notion carried. <br /> tiMoved by Councilmember Overstreet, seconded by Councilmember Longus <br /> approve the proposed conditions to be included in permits for a <br /> to <br /> { seeplimited Clearinand grading the of the site and rtion f existing <br /> allbe <br /> steep sloped areas,and the bond adding <br /> gond in Condition 1 12 shell be <br /> 1 in he amount of $60,0003,1 and etltling Condition No. 16 calling for <br /> l#im,, completion o by t August 31,1989. <br /> Rall was called with all uncilmembers voting yes except <br /> ncilmember Gipson who was excused. <br /> Cou Motion carried. <br /> 3 Moved by Councilmember Overstreet, seconded by Councilmember Morrow <br /> 1 to authorize the Mayor to sign an agreement with Berkley Engineering <br /> 'MJ,,,,km and Construction governing the clearing and grading c tivity, and <br /> $^{+ r[§ reclamation of he steep slopes Including a$60,000 bond. <br /> v ll was called with lluncilmembers voting yes except <br /> Councilmember Gipson who wasexcused. <br /> Notion carried. <br /> fl',4-1, PUBLIC HEAPING <br /> i� i: President Niva said she would open the public hearing to consider <br /> Mg, the appeal of mitigated determination of on-significance on the <br /> Jar!Mille.Apartments t 2510-2514'-Grand(SEPA 8152-88)and asked <br /> F'T. <br /> �. that it be continued to July 12,1989. <br /> $ Movetl by Couneilmember Giamontl, '¢tootled by Councilmember Pope to <br /> continue[he public M1eailnp until July 12,1989. <br /> Roll was called with all Councilmember'voting yes. <br /> yy carried. <br /> 7(( Nation c ied. <br /> Hk .'i I WORKSHOP-APPEALS <br /> PI <br /> k ,g`. the Iles, l would <br /> City Attorney,reviewed the narked types of appeals <br /> the council xoultl have recommendation <br /> hear. These included SEPA,CShoreline <br /> ommission 4 Permits which could be a r m dation from the Planning Commission <br /> Exappeal from th vel Hearingm missiooe[. Also appeals from the Hearing <br /> Examiner of he Planning Commission. <br /> Het alsowent <br /> went those itnstances Appearance <br /> of FairnessDoctrineand pointed <br /> out <br /> as <br /> part thatof the record (appeals from Hearing Examiner), Council should <br /> review the tape prior to Council's consideration of the matter. <br />