1989/08/16 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

August 16,1089 510 2. :eed for on-site retention/detention systems for water run ff. • Ohm 2aly '('Ilnet="e;hd' Department of!o7 71.shas=:".11 requiring some on-site detention. 3. guMrlezgg'skeltil.0,1,!:grtellranadtl jAcreinft,two.:eh;xi total nt dos andr y g.r e en nherm a.10,1aelq.uoir:mhentt.,-.sides of North Creek and they do .• 1.1ygg.1::;.oangd getting fluid Sear ex•ro Working corn.ezu.t om°biles(1.e. 5. No mention of signage along creek for wetland value or preservation. Ms. Cunningham said the applicant would address issues 4 and 5. 1 • Staff recommends that Council uphold the Responsible Official's Decision to issue a Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance with the required Mitigation measures as set forth except that Condition 5 on equestPage 2 of the AWNS should be revised per the applicant's • Robert York,of 10055 3rd Drive SE,the appellant,reviewed each of the points of the appeal. He also felt that the traffic issues had not been properly addressed. He asked that the developer/property owner should be compelled to leave the duplex area of Oa acres I untouched for now and for the future. Robert genway, 315 100th Place SE, expressed his concern for additional crime problems with apartment dwellers and that there is inadequate ingress and egress into the project which will cause major traffic problems. Reid Shockey,Planning Consultant representing the applicant,stated • I that an adequate environmental review and determination had been done by the responsible official. The design of the project is well conceived and meets or exceed the 1,3a Zone standards. Mr. Shockey reviewed all the issues of appeal. On item 4 of the amended appeal,he introduced a copy of the lease which will be signed which !, restricts car maintenance by the Tei tenants. On item 3, Ignage woul: br:coZ:geblethaff The than be"Orisiaorn"as if desired. Close IC:gfRm::11f411.1erstreet,seconded by Councilmember Pope to President Siva asked if anyone else wished to speak and no one replied. Roll vms called with all councilmembers voting yes. Motion carried. Moved by Councilmember Overstreet, seconded by Counoilmember Gipson to uphold the decision of the responsible official and affirm the Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance with the required mitigation measures and inclusion of the updated Condition 5 as requested by the applicant. Roll was celled with all councilmembers voting yes. Motion carried.