1989/11/15 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

f ( 470 November 15,1989 tikt COUNCIL BILL 8911-111 FINAL gEAOING: N ORDINANCE closing the "1986 Block Grant Neighborhood Improvement" Fund No. 381 as established by Ordinance No. 1270-86,as repealed and amended by Ordinance No.1293-86,as of January 2,1990. Cd a M ved by Councilmember Diamond,seconded by Ceuncilmember Overstreet �3 that this is declared t0 be the final reading of Council Bill 8911-111 and the City Clerk is directed to call the roll for the ,Gv final disposition of the ordinance. 4y AYES: Longus,Niva,Diamond,Pope,Overstreet 1 I NAYS: None l EXCUSED: Gipson,Morrow Pi Ordinance No.1656-89 adopted. PUBLIC HEARING President Nivs opened the hearing by stating the purpose is to consider the application for a Comprehensive General Plan Amendment and rezone with Concomitant Agreement for property located t 1816 a 60th.SE and 6010 Colby. She stated that court reporter was in attendance and asked that everyone state heir name and addressfor the record. She also stated that all those who wish to present t )I z testimony,would be sworn in by the Clerk. Justin Osemene, Planning Staff, stated the applicants, Howard and Bill Wilson, have requested the amendment and rezone for the two existing multiple family apartment buildings on the site. The request is to change the current zoning designation from R-1,Single . Family Low Density,to R-3,Multiple Family Low Density Residential, Comprehensive hensivenPlan Policy. gross acre, as stipulated in the pro y. This matter wasconsidered by the Hearing Examiner on Ma C 25, 1989 . I , A recommendation of approval for the rezone subject to a Concomitant Agreement. A reconsideration was rerequest and on August 8s 1989 a i II hearing s s held, an mended recommendation , restricting the height limitations on the structures to thee s givencurrent height. { d Nr. Osemene said there has been some confusion as to the'current 't building heights,which now has been determined to be 22 feet and 24 t y'q feet by the City's building official. Grant Weed, representing the neighborssaid the concern with the qqrezone is the height regulations which if the properties a extended would adverselyaffectOeth neighborhood. He,recommended 711 I that thestructure heights b verified to grade as determined in the Uniform Building Code. p 4 Kim Blunt6013 Manor Place, recommended that the plan amendment be 6 ssvY rejected and leave the R-1 zoning 1 place to assure that further i SM development does not change the character of the neighborhood. 1 Jim Erickson, 6101 Manor Place, said that the heights should be Y 11 restricted so that the views of the neighborhood are not impacted. e Y„”