Laserfiche WebLink
1 536 <br /> IDecember 20,1885 <br /> I buffers ran from 60 to. to 76 feet and said that it is important <br /> that the buffers have quality rather than the size of the buffers. <br /> Hesaid there were transition area, open space and recreation <br /> activity in the center of the project. <br /> Jim Allendoerfor repesenting CARE said there has been no Planning <br /> Commission recommendation this and staff <br /> recommendation. This project is drafted on a comp plan that was in <br /> error. Two sides of the property are R-1 Single Family Neighborhood <br /> andhe thought this should come beck with arealistic draft of the <br /> project. They have reduced the set-backs, no change on the wetland <br /> JJ buffers and increased the heights and he hasbeen told they ere <br /> 08 i presento changee it from apartments to condos. He said.the R-1 zone <br /> y on property should be retained. <br /> S Don 2evenbergen f 5422 Glenwood said the General Plan does not need <br /> 'i',,P3 { did bPeter lHeld owedsof 1 10 Lt Ls 151st ust aPl.S. end spoke against the rezone as <br /> ,Afjt LP' <br /> Simone Sutton oP 002]Dov x apposed Ohm project and felt the buffers <br /> 1„y R on the wetlands and eonsen dad to be improved. <br /> R John 150owe10 of 6715 Tyee Road objected to the project end James <br /> V Johnson of 4712 Glenwwotl Ave. said the traffic has increased on <br /> Glenwood end will be much worse if the project goes through. <br /> f ' Carl Varner of 5133 Dover St. said et one time this area had been <br /> I,� j designated as open space and urged the council to reject the rezone. <br /> fP i} I',I � I Pete Breysee of.5803 Glenwood Ave. said they had.been told the <br /> L '1 �9' negotiations would be stopped if the neighbors insisted on single <br /> 5 i I'mfamily designation. He asked the council to reject the proposal. <br /> 4I".ip1. John Lindggren of 1002 Slat Pl. S.X. objected to the rezone and a <br /> Sd' ; Blvdlett.who wereaeived from concerned aboutid 0 additionalitraffic.s of 1012 Mukilteo <br /> l <br /> �f I.l'',-; <br /> ,-; Linda zevenberger oP 5422 Glenwood also spoke eoP negotiations being <br /> stopped because the neighboxhootl rented it to x nein single Pemily. <br /> I',Yp President NSva asked about the ground rules and Bob Lendlee of the <br /> p Planning Department said he had set the ground rules because they <br /> A 1 w xe not coming to y decisions. When he said there would be n <br /> � single family discussion at least.they did make same decisions. <br /> President Niva said at the last public hearing the council had <br /> talked about single featly townhouses being constructed. <br /> y�iI Ed Hansen spoke of the negotiations and said they had agreed that <br /> pp III I this wee the only way to come to any conclusions. He said this site <br /> y. is located in southwest Everett close to large employment sax an <br /> and multiple family dwellings should be onan arterial and ne can <br /> �l employment center. He Pelt this was a quality project. <br /> A <br /> Councllmeaber Gipson asked Hr. Berg if the school district had <br /> f <br /> school <br /> the district mboutlit bee and is Berg x plied he had.calked for <br /> school igion.about it but the district had not actually asked for <br /> L the mitigation. <br /> 4, Moved by c0uncilmembme L.angua, seconded by Councilmember Gipson to <br /> #� close the public hearing. <br />