My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1990/06/11 Council Minutes
>
Council Minutes
>
1990/06/11 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2020 12:33:58 PM
Creation date
9/29/2020 8:40:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Minutes
Date
6/11/1990
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
222 <br /> p4 June 11.1990 <br /> $ The protests a objections which are made ill be noteditand <br /> nd <br /> considered and or <br /> responded to r the City to address the <br /> rotest has been riled,an opportunityo will be given <br /> Council. I4 a written protest <br /> test t has be tbeen P13eO in order to s heeblew <br /> toBefore <br /> do so. B written pro <br /> afore reading the protests wne sd calling <br /> indiOido is hl are working <br /> and avthencC from property o <br /> wnth ate any vide sptok about LID 729. Each will present <br /> information and evidence to be conside[ed bYth Council andthose <br /> 4 in attendance. du <br /> Blair Burroughs" special counsel tocthe City in relation to LID <br /> matters, explained the various ways of that paying <br /> for neighborhood, <br /> an LID. He <br /> explained the that it is an improvement mien are getting the benefit ar <br /> then the people in for it.r Improvements will provide a benefit to <br /> " required to pay <br /> property, that is,opertyase has itsfair <br /> increasetltin value,value, <br /> ale andsince <br /> property <br /> owners r owner's are bigated to poy the City Por v the cost of the <br /> improvementThe measure of special benefits i strictly -before <br /> and after test, whets is the property worth before the improvement <br /> {S, and what is it worth after the improvement. Th-differencee Sem the <br /> special benefit. <br /> Brian Jones-of Public Works showed a map of the boundaries of LID <br /> fit' No. 729 d indicated that the area within the LID boundaries <br /> represents the majority of the land that w annexed into the City <br /> II. limits LI none f inApril <br /> oo11rships f BebthinPrior <br /> he LI the <br /> boundariesformation <br /> hadf access tO]the <br /> City's sever system. w t access <br /> d i' 04 approximately 13 ne The c e t <br /> t1.g� The LID c vers en ex .within thespxopoee0 LI Ss <br /> ening designation for all the property <br /> i <br /> 1 LBognJ29 twtishHaoturL <br /> e 1 UesttlLpaav steer <br /> Palling septic systems with sanitary sewers. <br /> y Because of the uniformity of land use n and benefit <br /> among the <br /> ownerships located within the LID boundaries, assessablen <br /> 0;' ofthe project cost , $182,905, has been apportioned amongst the <br /> owners a the basis of building lots. <br /> ilk President Pope then asked to h any letters of protest read into <br /> 111 SF ,' the ord. 8 letter from Mx Robert Nountltield was read. Mx. <br /> Nountirieltl was in attendance. <br /> Brian Jonas, explained that Mr. Mountofleld'e property had the <br /> potential of being eobdtubdetl{however,Or.Nountltield had plans to <br /> ad to M1Sa,home, thus the property would n t be subdivided. • <br /> Jones indicated that he had talked with Mx. Noufits proopet about <br /> signing a covenant precluding the ability to subdivide his property. <br /> } Nx.Nountlfieltl was asked i4 this solution was satisfactory to him <br /> ,� dna na inaxc.tta it wee. <br /> , <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.