Laserfiche WebLink
• 121 <br /> March 15,1991 <br /> COUNCIL BILL 9103-10 <br /> FIRST READING: <br /> AN ORDINANCE relating to drug free zones, possession of <br /> drug paraphernalia cm <br /> marijuana <br /> arijua certain public <br /> places or facilities, addinga new section to Everett <br /> Municipal Code Chapter 10.35. <br /> C PUBLIC MEETING <br /> Gerry Ervine, Planning, explained to cancilmembers that this <br /> was a public meeting to discuss anappeal by Phil Foubert <br /> regarding the Hearing Examiner's decision upholding an <br /> administrative decision of.the Planning Director denying lot <br /> certification,making the Foubert lot unbuildable. <br /> Or. Foubert has requested that the City certify that the <br /> subject property 3 buildable for a single family dwelling. <br /> The property is e,t50 Pest in areaand has h requires <br /> of 50 <br /> feet. The subject property is zoned d-1, which requires a <br /> minimum lot sizejof),0square an feet rd.antl a minimum width of 60 <br /> ,. Peet. The subject lot is substandard. <br /> C <br /> The subject <br /> if{ ofty was separated the adjacent lrs <br /> through the sale of theproperty on August 12, 195 <br /> 7, of Mr. <br /> Foubert. The Zoning Code requires that substandard lots be <br /> conveyed prior to December 1,1956, <br /> In order to be buildable. <br /> Gerry Ervine told Council their opt:its were to uphold the <br /> Hearing:Examiner's decision andadopts resolution denying the <br /> appeal or to hold a public hearing. <br /> Mr. Phil Foubert,4620 95th Avenue NE,stated <br /> ated he had purchased <br /> the property August,.1957 andpaid taxeson it since then. He <br /> further referred t 39.Bao stating the code does not apply <br /> as to thea legal lot E status of the two Combined lots. He said <br /> C that there were any lots In this area that were the same size <br /> and had been built on. He felt this issue was a moral issue <br /> and asked Council's consideration to declare the property <br /> buildable. <br /> Councilman Overstreet asked what the a ssed value of the lot <br /> was and if Mr. Foubert felt the Hearing Examiner had made any <br /> error's in fact or omissions. Mr. Foubert felt the Hearing <br /> Examiner hadn't. <br /> Hank ertt famtt,.149 mathet',TOloketl ngtoPosupreapkoinnnts:behfthoe4 She <br /> C <br />