Laserfiche WebLink
0 281 <br /> June 5,1091 <br /> c) A protest letter from L. M.6 Shirley Woolwine and Ken 8 Ramona <br /> Houser was presented to Councilmembers as Exhibit 6. President <br /> Morrow asked if the Woolwine, Housers, or their representative <br /> wished to present oral testimony and no one replied. <br /> A protesa letter from Richard and Colleen Van Beek was presented <br /> to Councilmembers as Exhibit 7. President Morrow asked if the <br /> Van Beeks or their representative wished .to present oral <br /> testimony and no one replied. <br /> A protest.letter from Joseph E. and Betty A Keller was presented <br /> to councilmembers as Exhibit 8. PreSilent Morrow asked if the <br /> Kellers or their representative wished to present oral testimony , <br /> and no one replied. <br /> Brian Jones, LID Administrator, reviewed the points of protest <br /> and explained the method of determining the final assessment for <br /> each property. He presented as Exhibit 0, a short plat <br /> schematic on the Keller property which the Keller° kad <br /> produced. This schematic was used as a factor in determining <br /> the final assessment on the Keller property. <br /> Mr. Jones presented es Exhibit 10, a drawing of the Van Beek <br /> property showing the development possibilities without impacting <br /> the wetlands. This drawing substantiates the final assessment <br /> determination. <br /> Mr. Jones presented as Exhibit 11,a drawl,of Woolwine/Houser <br /> property <br /> nos";the ",!h:lo.gTagiT1 <br /> possibleabuildInaractsownitch.was used ing trapecias benefit <br /> evaluation. <br /> IN:eglfrog::11zB Gipson, seconded by Councilman Pope to close <br /> President Morrow asked if anyone else wished to speak and no one <br /> replied. <br /> Roll was called with a11 councilmen voting yes. <br /> Motion carried. <br />