Laserfiche WebLink
• <br /> January 8,1992 <br /> Roll was called with allncilmen voting yes except <br /> Councilman Diamond who was excused. <br /> Motion carried. <br /> MAYOR'S COMMENTS <br /> Mayor Ninch read[M1e following letter to Bnb Orewel, Sno M1omisM1 <br /> County Executive into[he recgrtl. <br /> I s k your assistance in bringing together then espective <br /> NC <br /> parties; R O, the County and the cities, i thehopes of <br /> developing AB a <br /> site selection review process which is Pair, <br /> equitable toall concerned,and open to the public. <br /> As you are no w <br /> doubt a the matter of locating an intermodal <br /> truck to rail facility far them <br /> ent of long-haul <br /> garbage i again before the City of Everett. The RABANCO <br /> Company is seeking to locate at a site near Smith and P cific <br /> in Everett. They have requested s <br /> acertification a to the <br /> status of ve this property for use ail facility. The City <br /> of Everett Comprehensive Plan does not such a facility <br /> at this location. However, the area may be eligible as a legal <br /> non-cofforminguse far such a facility (the use may be /1C <br /> grandfathered). <br /> The issue of siting this facility has become increasing <br /> Pox umber communities In Snohomish County. <br /> concern <br /> wever,you may not CO aware in 1990, the oCity of Everett <br /> did request R 0 t0 utake a site selection process. On <br /> September 26,P81.0 Iot e to RABANCrequesting that they <br /> "—consider' (voluntaxily) offering t or more alternative <br /> sites for consideration—, RABA'.one <br /> by agreeing to <br /> entersite selection process. their response of <br /> October r l,1990 they aid o <br /> .the community's needs as well e <br /> our company.will be best served by an environmental review <br /> process encompassing alternative <br /> On the basis of this commitment, the City and the County <br /> entered into an interlocal agreement to share lead agency <br /> status antler SEPA. We agreed conduct a joint r w to <br /> expedite the process for RABANCO and all <br /> concerned. We <br /> believed then, w, that such a process is n thegreater <br /> interest of the whole of Snohomish County. <br /> For its part, RABAN CO.did agree to undertake a site selection <br /> review processnv <br /> did selectreview. <br /> eight sites for <br /> Unfortunately,in the midst of the review, (June 18,1991) <br /> 1 <br />