My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2001/08/22 Council Minutes
>
Council Minutes
>
2001/08/22 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2020 3:25:34 PM
Creation date
9/29/2020 3:19:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Minutes
Date
8/22/2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
August 22,2001 <br /> Commilmember Campbell questioned whether,with the addition of the errata <br /> sheets and the language for ecrivner's errors,it would be appropriate to pass all of <br /> the proposed ordinances mid resolution with one motion.Attorney Soine stated <br /> that amotion could bo made to adopt items 16 through 26 as one motion including <br /> acceptance of the errata sheets and Ne amendments as provided by staff.The City <br /> Clerk would then record those votes on each individual ordinance. <br /> Gail Qtism 4601 S.4a,questioned whether the Planning Director's interpretation <br /> regarding the Endangered Species Act is included in the Local Project Review <br /> Procedures Ordinance.Bob handles stated that itis not.Gail requested that these <br /> ordinances not be adopted until a public workshop is held. <br /> David Mascarenas,517 Laurel(hive,expressed concern regadl,g the Hearing <br /> Examiner's process for reconsideration <br /> Moved by Couneilmember Warnock seconded by Cou0eilmember <br /> Overstreet to close the public hearing. <br /> Roll was called with all councilmembers voting yes. <br /> Motion carried. <br /> Moved by CounclimembeWarnock,seconded by member to adopt <br /> agenda items 16 through 26, <br /> 26,inadudiug the two errataa sheets,the addition of <br /> the Moping,in section 26 to each Item,and the amendment with language <br /> slating that the beeped review process remain with the City Council. <br /> Roll was called with ell rouncilmembers voting yes. <br /> Motion carried. <br /> 362 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.